Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Ring Games Table Selection: 6 Players or 10 Players?

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Default Ring Games Table Selection: 6 Players or 10 Players?

    I understand that most people tend to choose 10 players over 6 players. However, don't other people find the 10 player tables to be too slow? Also, am I correct in believing that if you're playing against 5 others that you see more hands per hour. Isn't this a good thing? Thanks in advance for your insight.
  2. #2

    Default Re: Ring Games Table Selection: 6 Players or 10 Players?

    Quote Originally Posted by bjj_jay
    don't other people find the 10 player tables to be too slow? Also, am I correct in believing that if you're playing against 5 others that you see more hands per hour.
    A lot of people here will multi-table. That makes up for any loss they would have by not seeing as many hands.
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  3. #3
    shorthanded tables tend to attract better players as well. if you're a loose aggressive player then shorthanded tables are perfect for you. otherwise you'll make more money playing tight aggressive on full tables.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by hypermegachi
    shorthanded tables tend to attract better players as well. if you're a loose aggressive player then shorthanded tables are perfect for you. otherwise you'll make more money playing tight aggressive on full tables.
    I'd disagree if you are talking PP, SH tables have some of the worst players i've ever seen.

    You're second point is spot on as it reduces the mistakes you are making in full games by playing too many hands.
    Poker is all about the long long long long long long long term . . .
    Barney's back . . . back again . . .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •