Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

[5NL] QQ in SB...facing UTG raise and CO 3bet

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1

    Default [5NL] QQ in SB...facing UTG raise and CO 3bet

    UTG - Only 3 hands on villain so nothing to go on whatsoever.

    CO - 10/8 through 53 hands. Not much info, nothing out of the ordinary just super nitty.

    PokerStars - $0.05 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
    Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

    Hero (SB): $5.60
    BB: $5.00
    UTG: $3.23
    MP: $2.37
    CO: $5.45
    BTN: $11.45

    Hero posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.05

    Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has Q Q

    UTG raises to $0.25, fold, CO raises to $0.75, fold, Hero ???

    OK so what do we think is best here?

    I think it's damn near impossible to put UTG on a range, although a 5x raise might tell us a little something about the strength of his hand? Possibly 44-JJ, KK+, ATs+, KJs+, QJs, AJo+, KQo.

    CO - I feel this is much easier. Has played super nitty with this being his first 3bet and doing it over a big UTG raise surely means he has me crushed? I put him on KK+/AKs/AKo....if I am talking myself into a shove possibly throw in JJ/TT, AQs, AQo at the absolute bottom of his range.

    Thoughts?
  2. #2
    I'm okay with folding against the super nit 3bet and the fact we aren't closing the action (particularly with the UTG open so large). Calling leaves us vulnerable without reads on UTG and if we 4bet and get it in here, we aren't going to be in good shape.

    If CO was looser, I'd 4-bet.
  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    hero folds, nh
  4. #4
    I would fold too. Calling OOP is awful, and I don't see how a 4-bet would be advantageous in this position.
  5. #5
    Yeah, sigh fold,

    maybe these two villains have history , and the nit knows utg does this w/ like 33-66, but we obv don't know.

    What would you do w/ AKs here cobra?
    "We're all just a million little gods causing rainstorms, turning every good thing to rust...."AF
  6. #6
    I would have an easier decision folding that than the QQ that's for sure.
  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    Quote Originally Posted by Cobra_1878 View Post
    I would have an easier decision folding that than the QQ that's for sure.
    why?
  8. #8
    Can you show a viable range which QQ has more equity against than AKs?
  9. #9
    I just think that AK is such an overvalued hand. It's two high cards, it's not even a pair. Usually you are looking at a coin flip ( slightly behind ) anytime you get your money in with AK and I just don't think that's a winning play.
  10. #10
    "Think", "it's not even a pair", "usually", "think"

    Stop guessing and put some ranges in Pokerstove and put them here.
  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascal View Post
    "Think", "it's not even a pair", "usually", "think"

    Stop guessing and put some ranges in Pokerstove and put them here.
    Sorry that was just my personal opinion on AK as a hand.

    I am not really sure how to do that? Do I just put in random flops?
  12. #12
    Pick a range, or even two specific hole cards. Run AK against it, then run QQ against the same range. Report results.
    Congratulations, you've won your dick's weight in sweets! Decode the message in the above post to find out how to claim your tic-tac
  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucothefish View Post
    Pick a range, or even two specific hole cards. Run AK against it, then run QQ against the same range. Report results.
    OK thank you, I think I need some lessons on Pokerstove, don't think I am using it properly at all haha
  14. #14
    Example:

    http://i.imgur.com/JNzT2.png

    You can either type it in manually or click on the Player names (Player 1, Player 2, etc) and then click on each hand there.

    Then click evaluate.

    I don't know why you'd post your opinion about a hand being overvalued when you don't even know it's equity against other ranges. You have no basis to decide it's overvalued. On the other hand, run the math then make a decision and I'll bother to listen to that one

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •