Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

How do increased stakes effect winrate?

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,189
    Location
    Live Poker Room

    Default How do increased stakes effect winrate?

    I'm just trying to understand something. At the low stakes 3bb/100 is a modest achievable winrate. At what point if any does that become unrealistic to achieve?

    e.g. someone grinds from 2nl - 5nl - 10nl - 25nl - 50nl - 100nl ....

    By the time they continue on and are playing 1knl giving the natural progress through the stakes and increased knowledge should it be relatively easy for them to profit at 3bb/100 playing 1knl? how about 5knl?

    Just wondering - does it get to the point where the opponents are so good that it's virtually impossible to profit?
  2. #2
    3BB/100 is doable, if you're a really really strong player, up until 100nl-ish.
    After that, I think the solid regs aim for 2BB/100.


    "Gotta run well eventually."
  3. #3
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    Few things... 3bb != 3BB.

    3BB is a considered a relatively achieveable winrate for FR players throughout the micro-midstakes games. However, FR is plagued with regs that just grind out fpps (fpp pros), because it's relatively easy to play alot of hands and make $3k+ per month if you are just breakeven player.

    I have a 3BB/100 winrate at 100nl/200nl, and feel I should definitely be able to achieve higher.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
    Few things... 3bb != 3BB.

    3BB is a considered a relatively achieveable winrate for FR players throughout the micro-midstakes games. However, FR is plagued with regs that just grind out fpps (fpp pros), because it's relatively easy to play alot of hands and make $3k+ per month if you are just breakeven player.

    I have a 3BB/100 winrate at 100nl/200nl, and feel I should definitely be able to achieve higher.
    So alot of the 200nl players just suck?
  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,189
    Location
    Live Poker Room
    Thanks yeah should've been more careful I meant big bets. What's a solid winrate at 5knl?
  6. #6
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging
    5knl doesn't run all the time on most sites. When it's running it tends to be a lot of regs that know each other and a few fish. The fish determine the winrate. I think at that point it's less about grinding out a decent earn and just picking the right times to play. I've heard a lot of talk from 400nl-1knl players about just not playing when there aren't many fish around.
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  7. #7
    What Dev said.

    Also, as the stakes increase you will run into more "solid" players, the wreckless ones play a little better, but the really big deal is the lower rake.

    In California most cards rooms are $1 pre-flop, $5 on the flop plus toke.

    HUGE difference between $2/$3 ($300 max), $3/$5 ($300 max), $5/$5 ($1000 max), $5/$10 ($1000 max) in terms of what % of the pot goes into the box.
  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,189
    Location
    Live Poker Room
    very interesting thanks for the replies!
  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
    Few things... 3bb != 3BB.

    3BB is a considered a relatively achieveable winrate for FR players throughout the micro-midstakes games. However, FR is plagued with regs that just grind out fpps (fpp pros), because it's relatively easy to play alot of hands and make $3k+ per month if you are just breakeven player.

    I have a 3BB/100 winrate at 100nl/200nl, and feel I should definitely be able to achieve higher.
    how is this possible?!.... if you're breaking even, you aren't making 3k+ per month lol...
  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Im_new
    Quote Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
    Few things... 3bb != 3BB.

    3BB is a considered a relatively achieveable winrate for FR players throughout the micro-midstakes games. However, FR is plagued with regs that just grind out fpps (fpp pros), because it's relatively easy to play alot of hands and make $3k+ per month if you are just breakeven player.

    I have a 3BB/100 winrate at 100nl/200nl, and feel I should definitely be able to achieve higher.
    how is this possible?!.... if you're breaking even, you aren't making 3k+ per month lol...

    I think Stacks was referring to the bonuses provided for big FPP players. So, by breaking even, the bonuses become the player's profit.
  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by okiman
    Quote Originally Posted by Im_new
    Quote Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
    Few things... 3bb != 3BB.

    3BB is a considered a relatively achieveable winrate for FR players throughout the micro-midstakes games. However, FR is plagued with regs that just grind out fpps (fpp pros), because it's relatively easy to play alot of hands and make $3k+ per month if you are just breakeven player.

    I have a 3BB/100 winrate at 100nl/200nl, and feel I should definitely be able to achieve higher.
    how is this possible?!.... if you're breaking even, you aren't making 3k+ per month lol...

    I think Stacks was referring to the bonuses provided for big FPP players. So, by breaking even, the bonuses become the player's profit.


    OHHHHHHHHHHH.....

    Good point. I'm an idiot.
  12. #12
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    yah.. Should have said that. My bad.

    But if you are saving up for the $4k bonus on Stars, I believe every fpp is worth $0.016. Therefore, if you make around 50k vpps per month, and your SN, then you make 175,000 fpps per month. This is ~$2800 (assuming you wait till you have the 250k fpps needed for the bonus).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •