|
Here is an intresting spot in which both arguments are true, but neither can be accomplished without the others failure.
Side #1 Villian has a draw and you try to raise enough for the value to be favorable for yourself, which i thought you could have raised slightly more maybe to $1.00 or so. This would create a positive value for yourself and he would be in a unfavorable situation,
However
Side #2 Villian has A-K, you raise the action to over 1/2 the pot, he then reraises and you are faced with a decision which could have been prevented if you had not raised his bet. You then fold (maybe) and you never see the Q and possibly a bigger pot.
The other option would have been to just call his bet, which puts him in the driving seat for the rest of the hand. After the turn he would fire out a larger bet(probably) and then you could then force the action by raising enough for the odds to be in your own favor, and if he has A-K you're in prefect position to double up.
I probably would have gone with option 2 in the moment. But as I am typing this post I realize option 3 would be the most profitable in most cases,(this one obviously turned out great for you).
|