|
HH Bias
A few questions for those of you that post and comment on Hand Histories.
1) Of the HHs you post, what % of them are losers?
2) When reading a HH, how often (if ever) do you assume that it's a losing hand?
3) Do you think that beginners or new posters are more likely to post losing hands than winning ones? If so, how does this effect your judgement of his/her decisions, particularly when the EV is marginal?
This of course pertains to HHs in which the results are in white or omitted. I know that some of you are going to say that one shouldn't be results oriented, and that it doesn't affect your judgment when reviewing a HH, but I still wonder how one maintains objectivity.
|