|
 Originally Posted by MacsenWledig
Sorry, I shouldn't have used straight/ flush like I did, and can see how that can be confusing. Basically, what I am trying to find out any differences in calculating your outs if you need to draw two cards immediately postflop to complete the hand versus needing to draw only one of the cards immediately postflop.
Okay, what I understand of your question is what is the difference in odds between holding say a 3 cards to a flush and 4?
So if you held 4 5
and the river came up
A K 8
You'd have three to a flush. What you're looking for here is the odds to a runner-runner flush (or if the flop had been A 3 8 a runner-runner straight?).
The reason most people don't talk about them is because it's REALLY unlikely that you'll hit them.
In the case of a flush you're a little under 25% to hit your suit and then you're 19.6% on the river (http://www.flopturnriver.com/chart_pot_odds.html). So you have a 1:4 shot of getting a 1:5 shot. Long odds.
A straight is more complex. If you have three consecutive cards 5-6-7 say then you have lots of cards to get you a draw. In this case any 3,4,8 or 9 for a total of 16 cards (so about 32% chance of getting a card that puts you on a draw).
At that point you will either have a 17.4% chance (OESD) or 8.7% (gut-shot) of completing on the river. A low chance of a tiny chance.
Letting 3-cards to a straight influence your decision overmuch would be a real leak. But if you've got a suited hand with say a gut-shot and you know that if the turn hits your suit your odds go from 16 to 26% that's worth bearing in mind when it comes to effective odds.
Long, rambling post. Hope there's an answer in there somewhere.
|