Pacific poker vs Party...

[trev]

Specificaly, which is the best place for $50NL? Up to now i've mainly been playing $25NL on pacific, which I find even fishier than party (believe it or not). Anyway, Im looking to move up stakes soon, is there anyone who plays both sites who can compare the standard of play?

[mulhollanddrive]

ive found that at:

10NL Pacific is probably 25-30% more fishier at the times I play (non peak) but at peak hour they are about the same.

25NL about the same, Pacific slightly fishier.

Unfortunately couldnt say on 50NL. The reason why Pacific is fishier imo is that it doesnt allow multi-table unless you want to overlap all the tables.

If you want to do a quick check, I'd check pot size averages on both sites at the same time.

[aokrongly]

If you want to do a quick check, I'd check pot size averages on both sites at the same time.

I think this is where you'll see the greatest difference, if there is one. You may also want to check fortune.

[trev]

Ok thanks for the advice guys. At a quick glance, pacific looks better with $10-20 av pot (highest on party about $12) with 45-50% of players to a flop...hadn't considered fortune so I'll give to a look later. Given the quality of play, should a 1K roll be enough to take a shot, assuming I don't mind moving down if I it goes bad? Or wait for 25 buy-ins?