Lunatic37: First we 3bet and
villain 4bet us, and we called his 4bet OOP. Which is exponentially different than calling a 3bet with AK. I would certainly be 3betting AK here given the
shorthanded nature of this game, and the
reads that OP provided stating that he didn't believe
villain would
fold hardly anything to his 3bet. Meaning we are WAY
ahead of is continuing
range, and there have loads of value by 3betting AK.
However, I wouldn't be looking to
flat a 4bet here OOP for numerous reasons. (1) We aren't going to hit the
flop all that often. What are we do when we
whiff the flop? We will be
check/folding very often, and that's a less than ideal
spot I do believe. (2) Against a
villain who is calling 3bets so often, I'
m sure his 4betting
range isn't strictly
AA/
KK, espeically
shorthanded. And would expect hands like
TT-
QQ, AK, and even AQ to be in his 4betting
range at least with some frequency.
AK is approx 50% against a
range of
TT+, AQ+, so given our pot
equity if we get it in preflop, along with all the
fold equity we will have, it's clearly a +EV
spot to
shove over his 4bet
imo. Much more +EV than flatting his 4bet OOP and c/fing all flops we miss.