So I'm reading Slanksy's Theory of Poker and something I'm reading doesn't make sense to me.

He's talking about playing tight or loose should (partially) be based on the size of the ante's (assuming blinds is no different here). He says that you should play tight with low ante's (in relation to stack sizes) and more loose with high ante's because, "Since there's more money in the pot, you're obviously getting better odds"

Seems to me that the odds would be the same regardless of the ante/blind size, as raising or calling, for example, 3x BB would lead to the same odds regardless of the size of the BB.

Am I misunderstanding something here?