|
|
Jibalob, please talk me through how a poker site could work each hand so that each individual player suffers what you describe. I believe the necessary programming would be incomprehensibly complex even with fewer than ten players playing simultaneously.
The other thing of course is that the example you give - 52o capping pre-flop vs aces - is an incredibly BAD way to cheat because, as you say, it's so obvious. There's no need to be obvious - have AK vs AQ, JJ vs QQ, trips top kicker vs boat.
I assume as a serious player you have pokertracker? Please find a couple of hands like this and post them - perhaps people here can give explanations that don't involve cheating or rigging the deck.
Collusion? Yeah, it happens, but at best it will be marginally advantageous - you won't have hand after hand being taken down unfairly because they never know YOUR hand. So it's not really worth it for the player, considering the possible repercussions if caught.
I firmly believe, after a quarter of a million hands or more, that no major poker sites or networks are rigged. And if you want your accusations to be taken seriously - and if I were Hollywood poker (part of OnGame, is that right?) I would be seriously and litigiously annoyed at your libel (as it is without proof) - you've got to post some evidence of suspicious hands.
|
In all seriousnes,,,,
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Jibalob
