Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

The math of bluffing

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    BankItDrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8,291
    Location
    Losing Prop Bets

    Default The math of bluffing

    How can I understand the thinking behind bluffing? Is there an equation such as: fold equity + outs = size of bluff ??

    It's easy to outbet a drawing hand, but how do I outbet a marginal hand towards a fold? Or is this too general of a question?

    I know there are dozens of factors involved, but I'd love to hear input on this.
  2. #2
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    <~~~~~Ur cock has to be this big to bluff.
    LOL OPERATIONS
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred
    <~~~~~Ur cock has to be this big to bluff.
    nice cock.
  4. #4
    although that was probably too obvious to be funny.
  5. #5
    yeah, 20 minutes later i realize that wasn't funny at all.
  6. #6
    30 minutes later you realize you are trying to catch up to jackvance in posts but give up when you realize it's impossible.
    Liter of cola.
  7. #7
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    40 minutes later I still have a large cock
    LOL OPERATIONS
  8. #8
    Halv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,196
    Location
    No hindsight for the blind.
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred
    40 minutes later I still have a large cock
    Does this mean that the guy that keeps sending me these "V-iagra make you lo.ve longer sens-ual w0man onl.y 1.99$" emails are for real? *inputs credit card information*
  9. #9
    BankItDrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8,291
    Location
    Losing Prop Bets
    Worst hijacking ever.
  10. #10
    bigred started it.
  11. #11
    samsonite2100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,098
    Location
    Your loosing, lolololololololololol
    Is there an equation such as: fold equity + outs = size of bluff ??
    If I'm in a hand where I feel that 1) villain has a marginal hand that I have good FE against and 2) I have a lot of outs, then I don't really look at it as bluffing--any $$ I put in the pot has positive equity, so I'm really just betting my strong hand.

    "Bluffing," I would define as more pure FE. I don't think there's any mathematical model you could make for it, considering all the factors involved, including position, pot size, chip stacks, villain's range, hero's table image, and most importantly probably, villain's stats.
  12. #12
    Sorry BigRed, but I prefer black cock.

    TheXianti: (Triptanes) why are you not a thinking person?
  13. #13
    A pure bluff were you have absolutely no chance to win if you get called are relatively simple to calculate the odds on. Just compare your bet/raise size to the pot size and estimate the chance of the opponent folding.

    If you bet 5BB in a 5BB pot your opponent will have to fold more than 50% of the time for it to be +EV.

    However, if you have some outs (semibluffing) or you think it's possible to get called by a worse hand it gets more complicated.

    I think this is accurate:

    EV = F * P - C * A

    F = Estimated chance of opponent folding
    P = Pot size
    C = Estimated chance of opponent calling (or raising)
    A = Avarage loss if you get called (If you have no chance of winning if you get called A = The size of your bet)

    Obviously F = 1 - C

    It's the avarage loss that's hard to estimate since it depends on so many things. If it's on the river the avarage loss equals to how much behind of your opponents calling range you are. But otherwise you have to consider the times you are forced to fold to a later bet. And if you are semibluffing you have to consider implied odds and redraws (if implied odds are big the variable A may even be avarage win). You also have to consider the times where you do hit your hand but villain had a better hand all along so you end up losing even more money.

    I'm a little bit unsure of the math here but it seems like that's how it should be done, someone correct me if it's not.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •