Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

NL Ring Skill Level

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Muxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,505
    Location
    Canadian LOLUH'S AND AMERICAN LOLUHS

    Default NL Ring Skill Level

    So after thinking about the skill level in NL Ring games do you think it follows the same pattern as SNG's.

    25nl and 50nl

    Is compared to as 5.50 sng's and 10+1's there is no skill level change.

    You step up to 100nlIs like steppin up to the 20's not that much of a difference some donkeys but a few more aware players.

    200nl More aware players more peopel exploiting certain players. 50+5 sng's a jump up in skill level. more aware players.

    400nl the same as 100 sng's
    smarter players couple donks/ randoms.
    100 sng players a step up from normal play and fewer donks / randoms.
  2. #2
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    sng players always suck more than ring game players
    period.
  3. #3
    Muxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,505
    Location
    Canadian LOLUH'S AND AMERICAN LOLUHS
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001
    sng players always suck more than ring game players
    period.
    I am just saying in general are they comparable not as a 50sng player vs a 100nl player but.

    If i grinded sng's owuld it be the same skill level change as grinding cash games. and where would the bigger jumps be.

    I don't want to compare 5 sng players to 25nl players. compare them to thier on game and the levels of play
  4. #4
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    if i was to find a competent 100nl player at sngs id have to look at least higher than $22s and to be honest id like to look a lot higher than that.
  5. #5
    Chicago_Kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,144
    Location
    People let me tell you about my best friends...
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001
    sng players always suck more than ring game players
    period.
    That's funny b/c lately I make a profit in ring, but suck it big time in SNG's. Call me Mr Bubble...
    "Been gone so long, forgot how to poker"
  6. #6
    SnGs don't break somewhat bad players as fast as the ring.
  7. #7
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    Full ring on Party:

    25nl: 85% fish, 10% semi-aware, 5% aware

    50nl: 75% fish, 15% semi-aware, 5% aware, 5% shark

    100nl: 60% fish, 20% semi-aware, 15% aware, 5% shark

    200nl: 40% fish, 25% semi-aware, 20% aware, 15% shark



    ...as far as I can tell.
  8. #8
    Poker Stars plays a level or two tougher (well at least tighter.)
  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
    Renton, define shark, and explain what the hell they're doing at 25NL?
  10. #10
    My defination of shark would be. Someone who is crushing the current level and needs to move up in stakes. Therefore a shark at 25 nl or 50 nl might only be a aware or semiaware player at 100nl. In my opinion rentons numbers seem to be correct except that the percent of aware players and sharks will be encountered more since they will be more likely to multi-table.
  11. #11
    LimpinAintEZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    822
    Location
    working myself up to FTR fullhouse status while not giving 1 solid piece of advice
    Quote Originally Posted by biondino
    Renton, define shark, and explain what the hell they're doing at 25NL?
    50nl is where he mentioned the 5% sharks - But I would like to know the definition of a shark as well....I mean, you still need SOME cards to win, right?
    this space intentionally left blank
  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
    Oh, you're right, silly me. I guess crushing the stakes is accurate, but there also has to be some sense of taking advantage too - I guess it's all intrinsically linked. maybe a shark is someone who has got far too good for the level but for comfort or withdrawal reasons, hangs around there anyway and pwns the fish? (I sorta do this at £25 but I'd never describe myself as a shark).
  13. #13
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    a shark at 25nl would be someone beating at 12+ptbb/100 for a large sample.
  14. #14
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    fnord at 50nl= shark
  15. #15
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Before he cleaned out his BR and checking account losing heads up matches, my friend was killing the NL10 and NL25 games on stars.

    And trust me, he was HARDLY a shark.

    Ya'll think I'm a nit?? you should see him.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •