Moving to NL100

[Tritoch]

Hi,

Long time reader, first time poster; I have been playing the NL50 tables for what seems like an eternity. I used to play NL100 and NL200 severly underbankrolled when I was "dead money". Realizing I was a fish I decided I would not donate more money to the better players. Thanks to FTR and some other sources I finally put my game together and started out slow. I soon began playing the NL50 games at Prima and Party Poker and also dabbled a little in Limit, though I didnt like it as much as NL.

Since January this year I have won 8k$ playing 50NL and despite cashing out wins I have managed to grow my BR. As of now my bankroll is $4000 and I feel it might be te proper time to move to NL100. Im not sure of this tough, and I would be glad for any advice you can offer. I play full ring exclusively, right now at the Tribeca Tables network (VCPoker). Is 4k enough of a roll to plat at these stakes? I used to quadtable NL50 but due to the higher variance of multitabling I have decided to just dual-table NL100 to start with. Also, since there been some time I played at NL100, how is the general standard compared to NL50? What kind of adjustments to I need to make? Any advices appreciated.

[bair]

umm 100nl is real easy its barely different than 50nl, and you have a big enough roll for 200nl, and definitely a big enough one to 2-table 100nl. why would you think you wouldnt have enough to 2-table 100nl, which comes out to $200 on the table, when you are currently 4-tabling 50nl, which comes out to $200.

[sejje]

Sounds like you've paid your dues and your 'roll is jammin'

Don't be afraid to drop back and recover any losses, but keep moving back up until you make it.

The game is soft.