Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

3-tabling $50 n/l

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1

    Default 3-tabling $50 n/l

    Just an odd question to the players that play $50 n/l who multitable. I'm just wondering how big of a bankroll do you need to multitable $50 n/l. I got up there once then hit a major downswing so I'm just taking precautions before i move up again. I'm well aware of the 15 buy-in bankroll management rule but that applies only to 1 table.
    "I want to win money so I play the worst. If I could find a group of 2nd graders with $200 bankrolls I would play them."

    -Aokrangly
  2. #2
    $1,500 minimum. That way you aren't risking more than 10% at a time. If you follow that rule and your bankroll is still taking major swings, you have some leaks you need to address.
  3. #3
    I like to have 2k behind me. Above that I just depends on your risk tolerance.
  4. #4
    15 buy-ins is the minimum, I like 20-30 unless im at a level Im very comfortable at and have played at for ages. (I generally 4-7 table)

    When multi-tabling, in theory you do not have to adjust your BR/Buyin rule - you're simply playing hands at a faster rate. however it may be a nice idea to stick to the rule where you're never playing/riskign more than 10% of your BR at once. The only way multi-tabling can increase risk is if you tilt, then you may spew more chips.
    Experimenting - 200NL 5max.

    "They say that dreams are real only as long as they last. Couldn't you say the same thing about life?" Waking life
  5. #5
    I thought your bank roll was suppose to be 15-20 buy ins for a level (i.e $1,000 is 20 buy ins at $50NL) without effect of multi tabling or not.
  6. #6
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    1000
  7. #7
    Lodogg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    199
    Location
    Stealing your C-bet
    I started 2 tabling NL 50 at $1000 (20 buy-ins). I believe this is okay because when multitabling you decrease the variance of bankroll swings. Double the hands=double the cashouts :0)
  8. #8
    Oh yeah, I forgot you are probably talking about full ring. 6max generally requires more buyins.
  9. #9
    Would you then play more hands 6-max compared to full ring????
    "I want to win money so I play the worst. If I could find a group of 2nd graders with $200 bankrolls I would play them."

    -Aokrangly
  10. #10
    $1000
  11. #11
    yeh at 6max u get thru hands alot quicker. there is also far more varience so you'll probly want 25+ buyins
    Experimenting - 200NL 5max.

    "They say that dreams are real only as long as they last. Couldn't you say the same thing about life?" Waking life
  12. #12
    1000

    20x the buy-in is a good rule of thumb, but more's not bad.

    It doesn't matter how many tables you play at once, BR is always the same for a given limit.

    Actually, multitabling should smooth out your hourly rate (because you're playing so many hands) a little bit, but that has nothing to do with your win/hand variation and win/hand rate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •