Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFull Ring NL Hold'em

Are people really this stupid?

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    10
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia

    Default Are people really this stupid?

    niiiice

    ***** Hand History for Game 3103271100 *****
    $25 NL Texas Hold'em - Sunday, November 27, 07:47:23 EDT 2005
    Table Table 65127 (6 max) (Real Money)
    Seat 3 is the button
    Total number of players : 6
    Seat 1: texastimmy ( $33 )
    Seat 2: Dockafinn ( $13.40 )
    Seat 4: PaleMan1 ( $23.70 )
    Seat 5: koowee ( $62.49 )
    Seat 6: funkspunk ( $25.60 )
    Seat 3: Golden_Hand1 ( $24.40 )
    PaleMan1 posts small blind [$0.10].
    koowee posts big blind [$0.25].
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to Golden_Hand1 [ Ts Jd ]
    funkspunk calls [$0.25].
    texastimmy folds.
    Dockafinn folds.
    Golden_Hand1 calls [$0.25].
    PaleMan1 raises [$0.40].
    koowee calls [$0.25].
    funkspunk calls [$0.25].
    Golden_Hand1 calls [$0.25].
    ** Dealing Flop ** [ 9h, Th, 8c ]
    PaleMan1 checks.
    koowee checks.
    funkspunk checks.
    Golden_Hand1 bets [$2].
    PaleMan1 calls [$2].
    koowee folds.
    funkspunk folds.
    ** Dealing Turn ** [ Qc ]
    PaleMan1 is all-In.
    Golden_Hand1 calls [$21.20].
    ** Dealing River ** [ Tc ]
    PaleMan1 shows [ Ac, Kc ] a flush, ace high.
    Golden_Hand1 shows [ Ts, Jd ] a straight, eight to queen.
    PaleMan1 wins $46 from the main pot with a flush, ace high.

    I hit my straight on the turn and my opponent decided to go all in on the turn and hit his flush draw on the river .. love it
  2. #2
    He did a semi bluff......basicelly here is his thinking:

    If my opponement dont have the jack, he surely fold and i win the pot right here.(and most of the time he wont have it).

    If my opponement has it, i still have 3 outs(jack) + flush draw.

    numbers sounds like this:

    70% of the time opponement fold and i win 5$
    24% of the time i loose 20$
    6% of the time i win 26$

    However im not quite sure it was well used in this hand(the pot dont seem huge enough to me to do this). But its probably not too negative.

    If the 70% fold is accurate, his play is +EV. But it is probably less than that and then the play is -EV. But if the pot was a little more huge(10$) it would be good.

    You got unlucky but his play is not idiotic.
  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    10
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    i understand your logic, i guess you get lucky sometimes
  4. #4
    Yea he did get very lucky but you have to understand he did that for his fold equity, while still having something left behind. But maybe he was a bit an idiot in this hand.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Golden_Hand
    i understand your logic, i guess you get lucky sometimes
    Proper poker is not about luck, it's about odds over time.

    As mouteut said, if he thinks he has a 70% chance of folding you then:

    70*5 = +350
    24*20=-480
    6*26=+156

    As you can see even in this case it's a borderline play, but a play that, over 100 hands, will net $26.

    Understanding this aspect of poker and not looking at each hand in isolation, lucky or unlucky, will help you become a better player.
  6. #6
    Imagine instead of TJ you held TQ. His play would have forced you to fold and it would have been best play.

    I think 70% might be accurate....A lot of hands you could have been holding that didn't contain a jack.
  7. #7
    Yes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •