Meeloche:
Balance
Simple Definition as it applies to poker: Taking the same
line as a
bluff as you would for value, example a cbet on an AK9 board with 78o.
The point is not to
bluff 50% of the time and
value bet 50% of the time on the example board, but to credibly represent a hand in your value
range every time you
bluff. As you move up in stakes and you begin to play against people who are thinking about more details than the colour of their cards you have to play in a way that they cannot
exploit you. Basic example: A
TAG villain opens from the CO and you
call out of the BB with a certain
range. The
flop comes 2s7h8h. You
check because that’s what you do with your entire
range of hands.
TAG villain cbets for ¾ of the pot. If you only c/r here with 88, 77, 78and 22 (which are definitely in your
range in the BB) you are exploitable. By doing this you allow
villain to play perfectly against you. He can cbet this board 100% of the time and make a profit because he knows the only time you c/r is if you have a
set or
top 2 and if you
call you either have a weak
made hand or a
draw which he can
barrel you off of on appropriate
turn and
river combinations. When you widen your c/r
range on this board to include draws, over pairs,
tptk and
air.
Villain is in a much more difficult
spot. The basic adjustment is that he will usually make is to do 2 things. He will play his
nutted hands very aggressively and the rest of his
range passively. This change in behavior helps you play perfect against him with your
range of hands.
Mid-Stakes and
High stakes poker is a game of adjustments. In the above paragraph I talked about a simple example of how widening and balancing your c/r
range on a certain
board texture creates a difficult situation for
villain and forces him to play his hand in a way that is easy to read. When you meet villains that have this knowledge already they are going to be
adjusting to this. This brings perceived ranges into the equation and my next point.
Being perfectly balanced in all situations isn’t always the most +ev situation. There are situations where I
don’t need to have
air in my
range because
villain assumes that I have
air in my
range so my
nutted hands still get paid off. An example of this is in
blind versus
blind dynamics versus aggressive
mid stakes regulars. For example: it is folded around to me on the
button and I
open to 3bb, the SB folds and an aggressive
regular who can be spewy at times 3 bets to 10bb. What I know about the
villain is that he is very aggressive preflop. I know that he is aware that I’
m raising a wide
range on the
button and that he knows that I know that this is a good
spot for him to 3 bet me
light. Therefore this is a good
spot for me to 4 bet him
light and he knows this. I know this particular
villain will assume that I have
air in my 4 betting
range based on my preflop
stats and the fact that I am a
regular and
open a wide
range on the
button. This would not make it a profitable 4 bet
bluff spot since he is liable to 5 bet
jam on me with a wideish
range. The EV that I would gain by him knowing that I can have
air here is lost because he already thinks that I have
air in my
range. So I can
fold all the hands that I
don’t want to
felt and 4 bet only my value
range. I
don’t need to
balance my 4 betting
range in this
spot because my perceived
range already has
air in it.
When you are thinking about
balance you have to realize there is a lot more to it than just taking the same lines for value and for bluffs. When playing against thinking players looking to
exploit you, your perceived
range is much more important than your actual
range. As you play with good players more who are
adjusting to your actual
range as they learn about it you can modify it in a way to
exploit them. Unlimited holdem is a complicated game, but as long as you are
adjusting to others players
range and exploiting them you will always be +ev.
Noble:
Balance (unexploitability)
In this definition I will attempt to explain what
balance is & why it becomes more important to understand it as you move up the limits.
When you first start playing poker you
don't learn or aren't taught alot about '
balance' because at the micro limits your average opponent is only thinking about poker at a very basic
level - 'What hand do I have?' & they are also far too
loose, this means in order to earn $ you basically just have to wait for good hands and then
value bet the shit out of them.
However playing this style of poker your
range actually becomes very 'un-balanced' because when you
check you are usually weak and when you bet or
raise you are usually strong.
This only becomes a problem though as you move above the micro limits and encounter better players who are thinking about poker at a slightly higher
level - 'What
range of hands does my opponent have?'
These players are capable of exploiting your un-balanced
range by often bluffing you when you
check and getting away from alot of
marginal made hands when you show strength.
Your
range can also be un-balanced in a multitude of other ways both pre and
post-
flop.
Eg. If you only 3bet
KK &
AA pre-
flop your
range is very un-balanced and it allows players to
exploit you by being
able to get away from hands like
TT-
QQ/AK that you should be getting alot of value out of.
Even the entire lines you routinely take with specific hands can be said to be 'un-balanced'.
Eg. If you only
check-
call flop check-
call turn when you have a
flush draw your
range is very un-balanced and you're unlikely to get paid off if you hit on the
river.
So now if you
don't want
to go broke you have to learn how to '
balance' your
range vs these players, for example sometimes you will
check your good hands and sometimes you will bet or
raise as a
bluff so that you can't be exploited as easily, in fact by looking at the
pot odds your bet is offering your opponent you can determine the optimal 'bluffing frequency'. And by balancing your
range at this frequency it is possible to make yourself nearly 'unexploitable' in alot of situations.
Eg. You
shove your last $100 into a $100 pot on the
river.
To
call you your opponent needs to have a better hand 33.333% of the time. (Because 2/3 times he will lose $100 and 1 time he will win $200)
So if you
balance your
range in this
spot so that you are bluffing 33.3% of the time and have a better hand than your opponent 66.6% of the time you make yourself unexploitable, because at this optimal bluffing frequency even if your opponent chooses the best
option vs your
range the best he can hope to do long term is
break even.
So is this what you should be aiming for as you move up the limits - perfect
balance & unexploitability?
Well for a while I thought the answer was yes and I devised a pre-
flop strategy that made me almost unexploitable, but thanks to input from some of the more experienced players on FTR I learnt
that being unexploitable doesn't neccesarily make you the most $ & poker is all about maximising your $!
No, if you want to be more profitable vs these
level 2, 'what
range of hands does he have' players then you need to think a
level above them and ask yourself, 'what is my perceived
range vs this player?'
Then when you are considering a pot size
shove on the
river as in the example above you should be
able to decide whether he will think you are value-betting more than 66.6% of the time in this
spot.
If the answer is yes your opponent will
fold more than 33.33% of the time in which
case you should 'un-
balance' your
range by bluffing more to
exploit this and if you think your opponent will
call too often you should
value bet more frequently.
So thanks to FTR I have learnt how to
balance my
range and then once I understand how my opponent is likely to perceive my
range how to un-
balance it in order to take the most +ev
line.
I hope from this definition you will see that having an understanding of
balance and why playing a more balanced
range is important as you move up the levels, but that it is only a base from which to work so that you can avoid being exploited and then figure out how best to
exploit your opponents. A
case of understanding the rules so that you know how to
break them.
{splitting up the nutsinho challenge essays for the digest}