I recently posted this hand in my OP and thought it might invoke some worthy discussion.
I Feel bet/folding is better than check/calling on this board because:
We charge Kx hands that call but don't bet.
We're not getting bluffed not is villian turning a made hand into a bluff.

Bet sizing is purely for value against hands that can call.
We could opt to bet smaller to invoke a bluff, or check/call on boards where turn/river are blanks?

Please discuss



Villian is 33/28 over 60 hands. Aggresion factor 1.
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (6 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

UTG ($34.04)
MP ($48.92)
Hero (CO) ($59.47)
Button ($31.77)
SB ($14.55)
BB ($9.59)

Preflop: Hero is CO with A, A
2 folds, Hero bets $1, Button calls $1, 2 folds

Flop: ($2.35) 6, 10, K (2 players)
Hero bets $2, Button calls $2

Turn: ($6.35) 5 (2 players)
Hero bets $5, Button calls $5

River: ($16.35) 6 (2 players)
Hero bets $9, Button raises to $23.77 (All-In), Hero folds

Total pot: $34.35 | Rake: $1.71