Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

A few 200nl hands for review

Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia

    Default A few 200nl hands for review

    Losing confidence in my play. Heres a few with questions:

    Hand 1

    28/23 with 9% 3bet higher from the blinds (2.5k mined about 100 on this table). 80%+ cbet inc in 3bet pots.

    No-Limit Hold'em, $2.00 BB (6 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

    UTG ($384.76)
    Hero (Button) ($288.30)
    MP ($244.95)
    BB ($302.05)
    SB ($422.85)
    CO ($200)

    Preflop: Hero is Button with A, 6
    3 folds, Hero bets $5, SB raises $17, 1 fold, Hero calls $13

    Flop: ($38) K, 4, 6 (2 players)
    SB bets $23, Hero calls $23

    Turn: ($84) 9 (2 players)
    SB bets $55, Hero calls $55

    River: ($194) 9 (2 players)
    SB checks, Hero bets $192.30 (All-In)

    Total pot: $194

    Flop and turn both confused me. I know I have good equity but not really sure I want to stack off v's his stackoff range here. Then on turn I could just raise, but it feels really transparent. River is probably a bad shove, maybe only 1/2 pot it. I wasnt sure if he had AK or AA if his chance of calling changed much depending on size?


    Hand 2

    25/20 13% from UTG, 80% cbet 44% fold cbet to raise.


    No-Limit Hold'em, $2.00 BB (5 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

    Button ($207.20)
    Hero (BB) ($287.92)
    SB ($208.70)
    MP ($196.60)
    UTG ($452.90)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with A, Q
    UTG bets $6, 3 folds, Hero calls $4

    Flop: ($13) Q, 3, 6 (2 players)
    Hero checks, UTG bets $8, Hero raises $24, UTG calls $16

    Turn: ($61) 7 (2 players)
    Hero bets $44, UTG calls $44

    River: ($149) A (2 players)
    Hero bets $55

    I have $213 left on river.


    Flop isnt standard for me, but I'm trying to find spots to get more aggressive. River helps me, but seems like it either helps him more or scares him a lot.


    Hand 3

    Same guy from hand 1.

    No-Limit Hold'em, $2.00 BB (5 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

    UTG ($501.60)
    Hero (SB) ($353.15)
    MP ($283.65)
    BB ($343.92)
    Button ($200)

    Preflop: Hero is SB with J, A
    3 folds, Hero bets $5, BB calls $4

    Flop: ($12) 2, K, Q (2 players)
    Hero bets $8, BB calls $8

    Turn: ($28) 10 (2 players)
    Hero bets $19, BB calls $19

    River: ($66) K (2 players)
    Hero checks, BB bets $27, Hero calls $27

    Total pot: $120


    I think standard until river. I figure on river a check could get bluffs from his missed draws, and that he'd bet all his Ks. Any value in a c/r or c/c best? Anyone prefer a bet instead?


    Hand 4


    CO is relatively new to the table, seems like a TAG (21/12 over 30 hands)

    No-Limit Hold'em, $2.00 BB (5 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

    Hero (BB) ($203)
    SB ($201)
    Button ($200)
    UTG ($200)
    MP ($210.74)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with 4, 4
    UTG bets $6, MP calls $6, 2 folds, Hero calls $4

    Flop: ($19) 4, 10, 6 (3 players)
    Hero checks, UTG checks, MP bets $15, Hero calls $15, 1 fold

    Turn: ($49) 6 (2 players)
    Hero checks, MP bets $31, Hero calls $31

    River: ($111) 6 (2 players)
    Hero checks, MP bets $55, Hero calls $55

    Total pot: $221

    Maybe got some FPS here from some threads recently. Felt like a c/r here would be super strong and scary, so decided to just c/c. Likewise on turn I thought either it'd scare him off, or maybe he's drawing to the flush and I can give him a chance to hit planning to c/r pretty much all rivers except the one that actually hit. Now I'm down to purely a bluff catcher and think I probably should fold in review? His value range for the whole hand is TX or TT+.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  2. #2
    h1 - probably just standard

    h2 - dislike, i c/c down as an overall plan but could fold to barrels.

    h3 - bet turn bigger, gotta bet/fold river for a large bet

    h4 - id prob c/r turn then. gotta c/f river
    Jman: every time the action is to you, it's an opportunity for you to make the perfect play.
  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    559
    Location
    Rotterdam, Holland
    totally agree w Da Goat. but:

    H1: fold or 4bet pre?
  4. #4
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    We're around 150bb deep so I thought taking a flop IP was probably best. 100bb I usually fold and occassionally 4bet.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    559
    Location
    Rotterdam, Holland
    ah missed that. yes that strategy seems fine to me.
  6. #6
    Agree with Da Goat.

    I think hand 1 and hand 4 are most interesting. It just feels like there's more value to get by taking other lines, but maybe I'm just results oriented. It's also something I can improve in myself.

    I definately consider leading hand 4 on the flop.
  7. #7
    I think these were all misplayed except...

    H1: This all actually seems fine.

    H2: c/c or lead/fold flop.

    H3: Bet river

    H4: I'd just go ahead and c/r flop. As played fold river.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
    H2: c/c or lead/fold flop.
    What, really? Isn't a big part of the value in leading to induce random spaz raises?
  9. #9
    I agree with most of this, keeping in mind on hand 4 if your raising NFD's on the flop, then raising sets are a great balance. If your not raising made hands on flops then what else raises?
  10. #10
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    1) seems fine

    2) flop is good vs utg 5 handed, but six handed I think would be a slight overplay. C/c is good too on a board that he's likely to barrel. Lead seems pretty not good. Bet more on turn, bet more on river. Its the ace of spades, theres no way he has a flush, dude.

    3) More on turn of course. My first instinct on the river was to bet for sure, but you have an interesting point about the fact that he's pretty likely to bet any hand that calls in addition to a few bluffs (seldom though). That said, he probably wouldn't value bet as largely as you would (hence less +ev for you). Another interesting point in favor of checking is if you think he's capable of turning hands into bluffs and shoving the river when you bet (hence putting you in a very tough spot here, if thats not a tough spot and you are definitely bet calling, then no worries with betting).

    4) i'd lead flop with nearly 100% frequency, as played I'd play it like you did and fold river
  11. #11
    Hand 1 - seems fine

    Hand 2 - I'd rather c/r AQ on this board vs an MP/LP raiser than an UTG open. I'd just c/c down.

    Hand 3 - I don't mind the river check actually. Given action up till river, and his sizing, if I was checking river it would be with the intention of c/r river. I don't think he has > two pair on the turn, and he prob won't fold trips here. If we're not c/r, then I'd rather just bet.

    Hand 4 - c/r flop. As played fold riv.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  12. #12
    pocketfours's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,765
    Location
    Lighting sweet moneys on fire.
    My head started hurting when I glanced through and saw you call flop with set and monster draw, but then c/r TPTK against UTG raise.
  13. #13
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    Quote Originally Posted by pocketfours
    My head started hurting when I glanced through and saw you call flop with set and monster draw, but then c/r TPTK against UTG raise.
    vastly different situations and his play was perfect in both hands (other than not leading flop in the set hand)
  14. #14
    pocketfours's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,765
    Location
    Lighting sweet moneys on fire.
    Quote Originally Posted by Renton
    Quote Originally Posted by pocketfours
    My head started hurting when I glanced through and saw you call flop with set and monster draw, but then c/r TPTK against UTG raise.
    vastly different situations and his play was perfect in both hands (other than not leading flop in the set hand)
    I can't say I share your enthusiasm.
  15. #15
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    i think A6 draw flop call is optimal but one could argue for raising

    in the set hand, while c/ring might be more +ev in a vacuum than c/cing, leading is better than both, so i believe that your variable strategy here should be to lead and play strongly, and mix it up by slowplaying and c/c. C/ring flop doesn't accomplish anything deceptively, and theres nothing wrong with not having a c/r range at all in this spot.

    the c/r with AQ on Qxx vs a hijack open seemed best
  16. #16
    Guest
    I think c/r with TPTK might be optimal on that board if the guy thinks you're c/ring dry boards light or that you c/r flush draws on this board (both are good to do)

    the flop call with a monster draw is also optimal because we have showdown value and sometimes we'll get to show down a pair
    we're flipping with a king and he almost never folds one to a flop raise unless he 3bs Kxs light oop and we beat every 6, as well as light 3bs with small pps (unless he flopped a set)
    but I'd prefer a raise on the turn because people expect you to felt your exact hand on the flop so a ship on the turn is EXACTLY why we flatted the flop in the first place - we have a lot of deceptive value because nobody can put us on a flush draw after we smooth call
  17. #17
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    Wow, some really good responses in here guys, thanks!

    H2 - I agree totally with c/c being best line, there was some dynamic between us but probably not enough. Rentons point about the A meaning he's much less likely to have the flush is awesome, that completely escaped me both at the time and even reviewing.

    H3 - I normally bet bigger, I think this guy had been calling flop folding to biggish turn bets a lot which is why I made it slightly smaller, but I even so I agree bigger is better.

    H4 - I think is the most interesting which seems the case with the variety of responses. This was the thread that came to mind: http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...78.html#919643 where Nuts and Renton both talk about how flatting flop with both sets and draws should be standard. Is the 1 less player in here what changes things, or the fact the board is more coordinated?
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  18. #18
    AnTman_69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    471
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    The major difference between my hand and your 44 hand, is that your OOP and can't control the size of the pot as well. Villian could easily c/b this turn which would suck.
  19. #19
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    Not to mention in Antman's hand, Antman was in fact the PFR. In which case to raise the preflop raiser's cbet in a 4 way pot shows enormous strength. In your hand, the PFR had already checked the flop, indicating a fair amount of weakness. So whereas in antmans hand if villain would have raised, he would have had 2 other villains left to act that would presumably check the majority of their range to the PFR.
  20. #20
    1) Fine

    2) I probably c/c the flop but I think c/r is fine. He probably has like 12 combo's of Qx and only about 4 or 5 flushes so I think you can get away with bet/folding a bit bigger on the river.

    3) Yeah bet/fold river.

    4) Add me to the lead camp. I always get folds though but I guess I don't balance this nearly as well as I should.
  21. #21
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    Lead used to be standard for me in hand 4, changed because of that thread but I see differences.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  22. #22
    I didn't see that thread I don't think. I'll have a look now.
  23. #23
    Can't find it. Anyone got a link?
  24. #24
    anyone c/r TPTK in that spot and then check the turn?
  25. #25
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Irisheyes
    I didn't see that thread I don't think. I'll have a look now.
    I posted it in one of my replies: http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...78.html#919643
    Just dipping my toes back in.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •