Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Obama's Civilian National Security Force???

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1

    Default Obama's Civilian National Security Force???

  2. #2
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    an amusing sidebar as to why politics is bs: Guy jabs at Obama noting how frequently he's required to mention MLK. Then tees off repeatedly on Obama being a glorified community organizer.

    Also, I would tend to ignore any article about obama pre-election.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  3. #3
    SERVE UR CUNTRY OR DYE


  4. #4
    I mean, it kinda makes sense. We have the FBI whos territory is within these boarders, and we have the CIA whos territory is outside these boarders. It would be a little bit absurd to ask either agency to assume the duties of the other. But ya, what rilla said, pre election stuff is kinda moot.
    You-- yes, you-- you're a cunt.
  5. #5
    Well, yeah the articles were written pre-election, but I'm asking if anyone has heard about any reference to this recently. Like, is anything actually coming of it?
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by cr4zybe4utifu1
    Well, yeah the articles were written pre-election, but I'm asking if anyone has heard about any reference to this recently. Like, is anything actually coming of it?
    I doubt it... I think the big man has his hands full and will for quite a while.
    You-- yes, you-- you're a cunt.
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by boost
    I mean, it kinda makes sense. We have the FBI whos territory is within these boarders, and we have the CIA whos territory is outside these boarders. It would be a little bit absurd to ask either agency to assume the duties of the other. But ya, what rilla said, pre election stuff is kinda moot.
    I don't want a civilian army running around, especially when they're moving to make it almost impossible for private citizens to own guns (and no, I'm not talking about crazy people, but law abiding citizens).
  8. #8
    on a semi-related note, your avatar is kinda hot
  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by givememyleg
    on a semi-related note, your avatar is kinda hot
    haha
  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by cr4zybe4utifu1
    Quote Originally Posted by boost
    I mean, it kinda makes sense. We have the FBI whos territory is within these boarders, and we have the CIA whos territory is outside these boarders. It would be a little bit absurd to ask either agency to assume the duties of the other. But ya, what rilla said, pre election stuff is kinda moot.
    I don't want a civilian army running around, especially when they're moving to make it almost impossible for private citizens to own guns (and no, I'm not talking about crazy people, but law abiding citizens).
    Yeah, that's not happening. Guns are too hot an issue, and too many Americans want their guns for the Democrats to return to the issue, at least as long as there's bigger fish to fry, and at least as long as there are the high level of dems who likes guns in the first place. Obama admin and dem leaders have many times acknowledged that they're not going after firearms anymore.

    With regards to firearms, going the way of Europe would be EV++++++ for American society, but even with that fact it's not going to happen because the Second Amendment is ambiguous enough and there are enough Americans who love their guns. However, there are better ways of gaining the positive social impact that would come about by outlawing firearms without actually outlawing them.
  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    Yeah, that's not happening. Guns are too hot an issue, and too many Americans want their guns for the Democrats to return to the issue, at least as long as there's bigger fish to fry, and at least as long as there are the high level of dems who likes guns in the first place. Obama admin and dem leaders have many times acknowledged that they're not going after firearms anymore.

    With regards to firearms, going the way of Europe would be EV++++++ for American society, but even with that fact it's not going to happen because the Second Amendment is ambiguous enough and there are enough Americans who love their guns. However, there are better ways of gaining the positive social impact that would come about by outlawing firearms without actually outlawing them.
    I should be more up on this, but do you know what happened to that bill that was just in the House that has major regulations on guns with clips? Last I heard it had good support, though I haven't followed up on in in the past month.
  12. #12
    Nothing has been big news for a while, so I don't know about it. If you pay attention to conservative media it's ALL BIG even when it's not
  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by cr4zybe4utifu1
    Quote Originally Posted by boost
    I mean, it kinda makes sense. We have the FBI whos territory is within these boarders, and we have the CIA whos territory is outside these boarders. It would be a little bit absurd to ask either agency to assume the duties of the other. But ya, what rilla said, pre election stuff is kinda moot.
    I don't want a civilian army running around, especially when they're moving to make it almost impossible for private citizens to own guns (and no, I'm not talking about crazy people, but law abiding citizens).
    ya, I def see what youre saying.
    You-- yes, you-- you're a cunt.
  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    Nothing has been big news for a while, so I don't know about it. If you pay attention to conservative media it's ALL BIG even when it's not
    I don't really watch the news. I just hope that HR 45 doesn't pass, which I don't think it will.
  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by givememyleg
    on a semi-related note, your avatar is kinda hot
    Yeah, I feel hot when I get nauseated too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •