Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

50nl overpair and oesd

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1

    Default 50nl overpair and oesd

    No reads. Thoughts on what to do here?


    Full Tilt Poker, $0.25/$0.50 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
    LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

    Hero (CO): $141.85
    BTN: $58.05
    SB: $51.50
    BB: $100.20
    UTG: $44.80
    MP: $50

    Pre-Flop: 7 7 dealt to Hero (CO)
    UTG raises to $1.50, MP folds, Hero calls $1.50, BTN folds, SB calls $1.25, BB folds

    Flop: ($5) 6 5 4 (3 Players)
    SB checks, UTG checks, Hero bets $4, SB raises to $12, UTG folds, Hero?
  2. #2
    meh i dunno, call or fold i guess. I wouldn't raise here ever without a read. Calling kinda turns our hand up tho, so i think fold?

    Feels really nitty writing that down
    There's only one system. Bet. Lose. Borrow. Steal. Lose. Take the drugs. Lose. Prison. Death.
  3. #3
    I call because implied odds are sufficient enough, imo. Especially IP, but probably also OOP.
  4. #4
    Always call without reads.
    "This sure beats Super Mario Bros.!" is my ejaculation catch phrase.
  5. #5
    its not terrible to check flop here
    Jman: every time the action is to you, it's an opportunity for you to make the perfect play.
  6. #6
    kmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,612
    Location
    Not Giving In
    Yeah I'd check flop here for sure. So much of other people's ranges are continuing that I wouldn't want to bet here. I mean is it for value?
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by kmind
    Yeah I'd check flop here for sure. So much of other people's ranges are continuing that I wouldn't want to bet here. I mean is it for value?
    I would bet for sure. It's for value (mostly protection I guess, and some balance as I would bluff it too).

    UTG gave up his hand and it's still unlikely SB has hit anything, so you usually get 2 folds. I don't like the idea of giving a free card to 2 players that have overs a lot, and won't bluff the turn much if they don't hit.

    And once in a while you'll get c/red by SB and you can call. Once in a while you get a c/c from SB as well.
  8. #8
    I could check here and let a card peel, it sucks to get cr'd here totally. all turn cards suck balls anyhow and i dont wanna be barrelling.
    Jman: every time the action is to you, it's an opportunity for you to make the perfect play.
  9. #9
    frosst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    905
    Location
    count-n mah monies stewie-style
    ez call. if he has a set, then he'll stack if you hit. if he's bluffing, he probably won't barrel the turn.

  10. #10
    at these stakes your not gonna get cr bluffed, ppl rather fold or call even if they think your FOS here. So why not just take a free one. I would bet my hand if i had less equity.
    Jman: every time the action is to you, it's an opportunity for you to make the perfect play.
  11. #11
    Repeating other advice, check back flop (what worse hands are calling this bet and what better hands are folding?) and flat the c/r because you have some implied odds vs. a set.
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by zook
    Repeating other advice, check back flop (what worse hands are calling this bet and what better hands are folding?) and flat the c/r because you have some implied odds vs. a set.
    Worse hands that are calling imo; 33, 67s, 68s, 57s, A7s. A3s.

    Zook, I don't get it;
    Why aren't we betting for 'protection' against overcards (basically buying villains equity shares in the pot)?
    I agree this alone is often not a good reason, but I imagine the more opponents there are in the pot, the more important it becomes.

    It's not like we get c/red here very often, and even if we check and improve we're not gonna win a huge pot.
  13. #13
    shove
  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by minSim
    Quote Originally Posted by zook
    Repeating other advice, check back flop (what worse hands are calling this bet and what better hands are folding?) and flat the c/r because you have some implied odds vs. a set.
    Worse hands that are calling imo; 33, 67s, 68s, 57s, A7s. A3s.

    Zook, I don't get it;
    Why aren't we betting for 'protection' against overcards (basically buying villains equity shares in the pot)?
    I agree this alone is often not a good reason, but I imagine the more opponents there are in the pot, the more important it becomes.

    It's not like we get c/red here very often, and even if we check and improve we're not gonna win a huge pot.
    First, that's not many hands. Second, calls with 33, 68s and A3s are pretty terrible on this board. Third, I think we get c/r'ed a lot more often than we get flat-called on this board.

    I do think there's an argument for betting for protection but since you're not happy getting AI, you're not that happy calling a c/r and you're almost never getting flat-called by worse (imo) I'd rather check behind.
  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by zook
    Repeating other advice, check back flop (what worse hands are calling this bet and what better hands are folding?) and flat the c/r because you have some implied odds vs. a set.
    Hmmm.... I feel like I'm betting here 100% of the time.

    If this was heads-up I'd be much more inclined to check, but I'd rather not give two people free cards here. I also wouldn't be surprised if SB leads a strong hand some of the time here, given how coordinated the board is.

    I think SB might also call us light in this spot, because its checked around to us and we're betting such a wide range, that he might not believe us.

    As played, I call the c/r.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  16. #16
    Galapogos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,876
    Location
    The Loser's Lounge
    I fold. You're pretty much never good as is, and are hoping to hit the most obvious straight ever vs a set. Or if he already has the straight, you're drawing to split. You basically have no implied odds.

    I could go either way on the flop bet. Readless I think I bet here every time, not saying that's necessarily correct tho, it's just what I do.


    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •