My stats revisited

[kfaess]

Alright a while back I posted my PT graph and stats just to check in. That was about 3k hands total and everyone told me that was too small of a sample size to really mean anything. I did get some valuable feedback from that effort though.

Here are my new stats and graph after about 17k hands (I realize this is still not really a large sample size). What I'm concerned with in the graph is the red line. Is it supposed to be negative like that? And if so, is it supposed to slope so steeply negative? If I could keep the red line at about even money then I would be making so much more. Also, any feedback on the stats would be greatly appreciated,

Thank you

[Webb87]

About the red line, mine is in the negative too and only about half of it runs even, the rest is sloped pretty good. I'm interested to hear what others have to say about it, but I don't think the red line is of big concern at micros.

I looked at your stats and most of them look good to me, although you're quite tight, which might be right at 5-10NL. You could definitely open up more on your button and this would also bring your attempt to steal up, because 22 is low. I think 30-40 is a much better number here. Also your aggression factor is high at 4.30 and probably means you're overplaying some of your hands. You might consider looking through your database and posting some key hands so they can be evaluated along with your stats. That's all I know so hopefully someone else can provide you with more detailed suggestions

you're a nit
raise more from button and cutoff
you need to increase your raising range from those positions to show a greater profit

and 21% WTSD is kind of low
I don't know why since I can't see your aggression factor/frequency on the turn/river in the screeshot, the little popup thing blocks it

[kfaess]

Yesterday I watched the group sweat sessions and it dawned on me just how much of a nit I am. Perhaps the low VPIP and PFR accounts for the high agg freq and WTSD% because since I play a strong range of hands it would be easier to play them more aggressively than a wider range. This would also tend to cause a lot of folds before showdown.

Dunno though just speculating here... interested to see what others have to say