Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Poker math problem

Results 1 to 27 of 27

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guest

    Default Poker math problem

    Doing mathematical calculations in poker is important. We did some math problems in Ventrilo, but I still liked the first problem we discussed the best.

    What is the chance to get at least two diamonds in your five card poker hand? Assume you just got dealt five cards in draw poker. Answer will be posted after everyone posts theirs.
  2. #2
    Ragnar4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,184
    Location
    Billings, Montana
    1 in 4?
    The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes
  3. #3
    Guest
    How is that even logical?

    you have 5 cards
    you have 1 in 4 chance of getting one diamond for each card
    you need two diamonds

    should be closer to 1/2 (roughly) but I'm looking for exact answers
  4. #4

    Default Re: Poker math problem

    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    Doing mathematical calculations in poker is important. We did some math problems in Ventrilo, but I still liked the first problem we discussed the best.

    What is the chance to get at least two diamonds in your five card poker hand? Assume you just got dealt five cards in draw poker. Answer will be posted after everyone posts theirs.
    Wouldn't it be 13/52 (odds of first card) times 12/51 (odds if you get first card you get second card)? That would be 156/2652 or 5.8%. Or loosely one in twenty.

    Edit: Sorry, that would be for two diamonds dealt first two cards. Not sure how that translates into a five card hand.
  5. #5
    Ragnar4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,184
    Location
    Billings, Montana
    2 or more diamonds.. IE you could land 2 diamonds, 3 diamonds, 4 diamonds or 5 diamonds and satisfy your need for a girls best friend.
    The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes
  6. #6
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...

    Default Re: Poker math problem

    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    What is the chance to get at least two diamonds in your five card poker hand? Assume you just got dealt five cards in draw poker. Answer will be posted after everyone posts theirs.
    This really isn't relevant to any calculation you would ever do at the table.

    There's lots of cool math here:
    http://www.math.sfu.ca/~alspach/
    that won't help your game in anyway
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  7. #7
    Guest

    Default Re: Poker math problem

    Quote Originally Posted by swiggidy
    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    What is the chance to get at least two diamonds in your five card poker hand? Assume you just got dealt five cards in draw poker. Answer will be posted after everyone posts theirs.
    This really isn't relevant to any calculation you would ever do at the table.

    There's lots of cool math here:
    http://www.math.sfu.ca/~alspach/
    that won't help your game in anyway
    So what? I'm sure you could do this problem, but getting to the point where you can solve poker probabilities will let you analyse AWAY from the table.
  8. #8
    Ragnar4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,184
    Location
    Billings, Montana
    The thing that's throwing me the most, is that the order doesn't matter. As long as you end up with 20% of your cards being diamonds after having been dealt those cards, you don't care how you got them. That means we have to devide our permutations somewhere down the road... but I for the life of me can't remember when or what.

    Blah. Stupid probability. If I ever go back to school, I so totally taking a probability class.
    The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes
  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up

    Default Re: Poker math problem

    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    What is the chance to get at least two diamonds in your five card poker hand? Assume you just got dealt five cards in draw poker. Answer will be posted after everyone posts theirs.
    good question. Problem is that those who can answer it easily won't bother, and those who can't do so easily won't bother either cos they're too lazy to get better - instead they'll read the answer and fool themselves that they understand.
  10. #10
    Guest
    I don't think anyone can answer this "easily" it takes a few minutes anyway to get the correct answer. I encourage everyone to take a shot at it. If you're sure your answer is 100% correct don't post it until everyone else tries it.
  11. #11
    settecba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    354
    Location
    stealing blinds from UTG
    58.82% ???

    I wont post how i did it until you post the answer...or should I?
    Quote Originally Posted by ISF
    Getting good at poker is like that scene in the matrix where Neo suddenly sees that everyone is just a bunch of structured numbers and then he starts bending those numbers in really weird ways.
  12. #12
    settecba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    354
    Location
    stealing blinds from UTG
    no more answers?

    will you post the answer iopq?
    Quote Originally Posted by ISF
    Getting good at poker is like that scene in the matrix where Neo suddenly sees that everyone is just a bunch of structured numbers and then he starts bending those numbers in really weird ways.
  13. #13
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...

    Default Re: Poker math problem

    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    So what? I'm sure you could do this problem, but getting to the point where you can solve poker probabilities will let you analyse AWAY from the table.
    Knowing how to find 2 or more of a specific suit in a 5 card hand does not help solve any poker problem.

    I get ~36%
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  14. #14
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by settecba
    no more answers?

    will you post the answer iopq?
    yes I'll post it

    but solving this hones your MATH skills, not poker skills
    but those MATH skills let you do some poker analysis
  15. #15
    That's usual combinatorics, but I always sucked at it

    Chance to be dealt a first diamond : 13/52
    Chance to be dealt the second one : 12/51
    The three other cards don't matter as they can be diamond or whatever

    The chance that at least the two first card of your 5 cards hand are 13/52 * 12/51,

    But those 2 diamonds can actually appear in any of the 5 spots and the number of possible combinations is (without repetitions) 5*4 / 2 = 10

    My result is therefore 10 * 13/52 * 12/51 = 58,82% as settecba said. That seems a bit high at the fist sight, so I might be off the point.

    Thanks iopq for posting math problem, but it is true that I don't see a big interest of such calculation while playing
  16. #16
    Guest
    Here's the answer:

    We can calculate it two different ways, either by directly calculating the chance of getting 2,3,4,5 diamonds, or by calculating the chance of NOT getting 1 or 0 diamonds. As you can see, the second way is twice faster.

    1-(C(39,5)/C(52,5) + C(13,1)*C(39,4)/C(52,5)) which is 36.70%

    or you could do it the long way which is
    C(39,3)*C(13,2)/C(52,5) + C(39,2)*C(13,3)/C(52,5) + C(39,1)*C(13,4)/C(52,5) + C(13,5)/C(52,5)

    also giving us the same result
    swiggidy and spoon are the only people who got it right

    pilipolio and settecba did it wrong, because they overcounted
  17. #17
    25%
  18. #18
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Cardsharp
    25%
    wrong
  19. #19
    lolzzz_321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    7,476
    Location
    My ice is polarized
    50/50 either you get two diamonds, or you don't
  20. #20
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Triptanes
    50/50 either you get two diamonds, or you don't
    oh, you
  21. #21
    settecba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    354
    Location
    stealing blinds from UTG
    thanks iopq, i also think solving math problems IS going to help our game.

    i had trouble at first figuring out where pilipolio and i messed up, i can see it now...
    Quote Originally Posted by ISF
    Getting good at poker is like that scene in the matrix where Neo suddenly sees that everyone is just a bunch of structured numbers and then he starts bending those numbers in really weird ways.
  22. #22
    Guest
    here's how you guys messed up:
    imagine a simpler problem:
    what's the chance of getting 1 black card in a hold'em hand?

    you say, "well, the chance of getting a black card is 1/2, there's two cards so we will get a black card 100% of the time"

    DUCY this is wrong
  23. #23
    settecba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    354
    Location
    stealing blinds from UTG
    yes..of course i see...thanks again, great example

    BTW...to see if i get this right...the chance of getting at least 1 black card in a hold´em hand would be:

    1-C(26,2)/C(52,2)=75.49%

    right? or did i mess up again?
  24. #24
    Guest
    that's correct
  25. #25
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    I like counting like IOPQ did. You can also use the probabilities

    0.25 diamond
    0.75 not a diamond

    Exactly 2:
    0.25^2 * 0.75^3 * 5! / (2! * 3!)

    Seriously check out the link I posted. Counting the number of unique Omaha hands is fun.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  26. #26
    Guest
    the problem of course is after you have one diamond the probability of getting a second one decreases so your answer is not exact, but of course not far off
  27. #27
    sarbox68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,115
    Location
    wondering where the 3 extra chairs at my 6max table came from
    42!



    Oh f-ck .... wrong question....

    Dude, last time I did this kinda math was 10 years ago studying for the f-in GMAT. I get your point but I'ma have to find another option than mental combinatronics where close guesstimation is good enough...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •