It's not bad
variance at all, you're only 23.7% to win 5 75/25 in a row and only 7.7% to win 5 60/40s. You lost 1.5/5 (30%) of these situations when you were, on average about a 70% favorite? Holy crap the
variance! Is it possible for anyone playing poker to believe that they should win every hand if they get it in with the best of it? You're SUPPOSED to be "outdrawn a minority of the time" consistently. Otherwise you're just on a lucky run.
Accept the fact that you have to try to put your money in as the favorite AND get lucky to win in tournaments
Q1: Do you understand the idea of independent trials? The first 3
don't matter at all when it comes to hand 4, your opponent isn't "owed" a
bad beat. It's still exactly the same percentage, 75/25.
Yes, I do. How would the Pros handle a situation where they're getting good cards and they're in the early stages of a tourney where a lot of maniacs are moving all in? I mean the goal is to get to the money and maybe win the title. If a guy decided
to go passive and not play anything less than
QQ after gunning down a few maniacs previously, would that be a good strategy considering a
chip count in the
top 75% of the tournament?
Q2: Yes you should
call the 4th time. That's a
monster edge.
Statistical no brainer but as stated above is it a tactical error in SOME cases?
Q3: No it doesn't make sense to wait for a bigger
edge than 75-25, you're not going to get it. You can make an argument for folding when you're on the
bubble and can
fold into money but otherwise
ALL-IN!