Is this weak-tight?

[Rockymv]

Villian is 40/5

POKERSTARS GAME #5150627019: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($0.25/$0.50) - 2006/06/04 - 14:30:36 (ET)
Table 'Ate III' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: Skyrre ($45.75 in chips)
Seat 2: GL (G-man) ($36.45 in chips)
Seat 3: JLizard ($50 in chips)
Seat 4: silge ($55.65 in chips)
Seat 5: Remus1984 ($97.80 in chips)
Seat 6: ponderosa88 ($108.70 in chips)
Seat 7: racerrob ($71.05 in chips)
Seat 8: Rockymv ($87.85 in chips)
AMAZ1NG will be allowed to play after the button
Skyrre: posts small blind $0.25
GL (G-man): posts big blind $0.50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Rockymv [Qs Qc]
JLizard: folds
silge: folds
Remus1984: calls $0.50
ponderosa88: folds
racerrob: folds
Rockymv: raises $1.50 to $2
Skyrre: folds
GL (G-man): folds
Remus1984: calls $1.50
*** FLOP *** [5d 6s Ts]
Remus1984: bets $2
Rockymv: raises $5 to $7
Remus1984: calls $5
*** TURN *** [5d 6s Ts] [2h]
Remus1984: bets $20
Rockymv: folds

[freechus9]

Smells like a set. Limp/call a raise from EP looks like a pocket pair or some sort of drawing hand. Shows strength throughout, so I think your overpair is beat. I like this fold here.

[givememyleg]

I don't think this is weak-tight. I think this is aware-tight.

[gabe]

weak tight > strong broke

[Chicago_Kid]

nh, gf