|
Ruining implied odds
We all know that we should be betting around the pot to mess up a drawing hands pot odds. But in certain situations should we be betting more to destroy implied odds aswell?
example: (for the purpose of the example all players have 200BB stacks)
I have AQo and raise to 5BB, 1 villain calls
Flop :
i bet pot (10 BB), villain calls.. pot now 30BB, and the villain and i have 185 BB stacks.. turn is blank.
now if he has a flush draw then he has decent implied odds for it. but.. if i was to rather than bet the pot here.. bet say, 1/3rd of his stack (2x pot).. then if the flush falls, even if i go broke on the hand its a winning situation because i win 1/3rd of his stack 4 times for every whole stack lost.
I think this would be particularly important at low limit games because of the ridiculously high abundance of chasers.. thoughts anyone?
|