No one seems to be able to answer how we decide which factors are more important or how we decide what pieces of information are of more value than one another. Also how are we even able to decipher the information we are being fed that we turn it into reads about their playing abilities. It seems like we need large samples to start developing really solid reads from what I've read. Well then what becomes note worthy as you work towards developing these reads? I mean shouldn't we just 1-table and just note everything these players do? Seems like it would be very tedious and reading player notes would be similar to reading a page of a book after a few hundred hands; n with online timers well you got like 30secs. So that really begs the question still of how do we decipher through our information to figure what is the most important factors that should affect our decision making. Even for like minor decisions. I don't think people should just slack on so called ez choices. Every choice should have sound logical reasoning.