siknd when you say you don't need reads in this situation i agree with you 100 percent. The min raise on that board is usually either two pair or set
I would need to know more about UTG+2 to put him on a set.
I dont think fnord is saying that he would need a read to fold, he is saying that you dont know he has a set yet without a read.

At that limit, AA, KK, QQ, 2 pair, a set, and a straight draw are all often playing that way. I'd fold without reads, but with reads I might not.

No one is argueing that it's not a folding situation, just that it's not clearly, specifically, a set... and with reads it might not even be a fold.