Quote Originally Posted by Greedo017
"4. Also, if you have 4+ tables running at once, this also serves to cut variance down a ton."

This cannot possibly be true, do you see why?

-'rilla
Ok, maybe I'm wrong, but this is how I look at it. A single hand doesnt mean anything to a good player right? Even if a winning player gets into a situation where he gets sucked out on, he can be happy with his play because he knows that in the long run he will win alot more than he will lose if put in the same situation over and over.

So I guess my thinking was that if I see 40 hands per hour playing one table, the chance that I will get sucked out on is the same as if I see 300+ hands per hour playing on 8 tables at once, but since I win more than I lose, if I lose some random hand on a suckout on one table, that loss is absorbed by my winnings on the other tables.

Isnt it righ to say that the variance on 10,000 hands is going to be much less than the variance on 100 hands? So the more hands you see, the lower the variance to your BR. Playing 8 tables at once for a year would be like playing 1 table for 8 years....

At least thats my mentality, but feel free to correct me if im off base here.