|
|
Well, just a small in between answer. Obviously I want more than just win at 2NL. I want to inprove my game. But As I pointed out allready, funny thing of pokertracker is you can see other people do it and also how they do it. Like "72oEnough" I have like 1200 hands on him and he has a verry nice 45 degfrees upgoing graph. He`s not really posiotional aware has vpip of 10 and pfr of 4 so he`s just verry tag / fitfoldish and that works. Well this is "just" a matter of adjusting your game to your opponents as it just assumes the other ones are going to make mistakes, as they will at 2NL. It really shows that nutcamping does it in this level. But I`m sure there`s better winrates possible.
Doing all this study allready starting to give me trust again. Also thinking about all this lets me realize that with renton`s article I pretty much was there but, when I start with a bluff and it works I get results oriented, knowing what my equity is when bluffing will help me not to start bluffing all my hands. (a c betting of 100% is not strange to me). I hope spoonit exercises will help me !!
Ranges and putting them on something is wat I started learning. Speaking of this, has no one a comment at the strange thing in pokerstove especially in comparison to the line spoonitnow suggests ??
Another strange thing in pokerstove. At 6% AQo still isn`t in it but it does give ATs, which spoonitnow places for open raisingon MP2.
Are these cards really better than AQo ?? So I matched them in pokerstove and it gives 69.368% equity for the AQo Anny comments ??
Posting my tracker stats doesn`t do really much I think, as I`m really changing my game regulary to learn what certain changes will do for me. I might do this in the future as my new (spoonitnow`s) game develops.
Thnx for all input
Greetings
Tha learning fish.
Editted cause wrighting all this really gets me thinking.
I`m learning lots 
|
Reply With Quote