|  | 
			
			
			
					
					
			
				
					
						
	Aren't you offering great pot odds and reverse implied odds for almost any two cards with your 1/4 pot bet? Like  in your example, say villain has a hand like 56o or  A6. You're gonna have trouble knowing when you're beat and not offering up some value when he hits. And you're just value betting villain's hand at exactly the right price for his QJ, KJ, AJ and KQ. Seriously, think of the range of hands that just calls like KT, K9, J9 and A9 - this seems like spewing chips worse than the check/fold line.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by Ghaleon Feeler (or probe) bets are something I use when the board is draw  heavy and I'm out of position  with a marginal  hand.  I think check /folding this situation will get costly over time.
 
Let's say I'm  in early position  with pocket 7's and the board is 6,9,10 with two spades.  Sure I can bet big and chase  out the draws, but almost anything that calls has me beat.
 
Seems like the better play is to bet 1/4 or 1/3 of the pot.  This will surely chase  out the total junk hands.  Flush  and straight  draws will still call , but at least you'll know exactly where you stand.  Also, anyone with top pair , or two pair  on a draw  heavy board will almost certainly try to defend their hand by re-raising.
 
In the above example, if the turn  is a straight  card or a spade, I can check /fold  and only take a minimal loss.  If the turn  is a blank , then I can feel very confident about betting the car payment.
 
But in the end, I think it really depends on your reads  at the table, and your own table image .  It becomes a very vulnerable play once someone catches on to what you're doing. |