|
|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
There always seems to be a tendancy to consider unknows at the micros to be donks who go wild with any top pair. I think if villain was a complete donk, then hero would have at least some sort of read after ten hands, so I'd be more inclined to believe villain has at least some idea what he's doing, at least until he shows us that he doesn't. We do have a read, that he's not done anything stupid in the ten hands we've seen. Donks can't usually hold out this long without some form of spew.
I second that. Underestimating your opponent, in poker as in everything else, is a mistake. My "standard unknown" at 5NL is pretty TAGG until proven otherwise. However, it doesn't take much to have an idea, like the villain in the OP who is not full stacked and raised 3xbb in EP behind a limper, these are the first hints that he is probably not all that good. I am defo not folding my set here.
Originally Posted by PokerWang
If you want to set-mine then you want to do it as cheaply as possible. If you don't hit your set, you fold. You also have to make better reads to know if your opponent has a better set.
Some mod please strike this guy who has 81 perfectly useless one line posts to his count, stating the obvious or repeating what other posters in the thread already said.
|
Reply With Quote