pretty straightforward here, I like a 4bet. I think folding is asinine though; and a cold-call is slightly better.
The conditional probability of a 59/11 being a fucking idiot is pretty high. The conditional probability of a 59/11 3betting only QQ+, AK is not high, even if he is somehow aware that UTG+1 is a nit opening from EP.
In summary: 4-bet>call>fold.
Nit's range is probably something like AQ+, 99+, with perhaps a side of KQs (this works out to 5.4%). Moron's range can be anything from TT+, AK, to a bunch of other retarded bullshit. 59/11. Dude has no clue, he may think of 3betting AJs there for value. "Oya, he's passive, he's calling almost 6x as much as he's raising pre"----> if you think this implies an ultratight 3bet range from a player of this caliber at 5nl where we now have to fold QQ then please get a fucking clue.
As an aside, it'd be nice to know if he's positionally aware at all - if not...
also I want to smack openside for saying this is a cold fold, seriously dude what the fuck.
Reply With Quote