am i a fcking dumb nit?

Originally Posted by eugmac

please explain fold when that is the range you give them.

Looking at that I can only assume the range I gave them at the time was KK+ and AK rather than QQ+

What I do remember clearly was when I did the math afterwards I didn't have anywhere near the equity to make it a call. However, in hindsight I was probably being unduly influenced by already knowing they had AA.

The two hands sort of stuck in my head because during the hand I did contemplate folding KK for a brief second before thinking "only AA beats me so stick it in" rather taking a few seconds to think about it and really assign a proper range during play.

Originally Posted by PKKFW

Looking at that I can only assume the range I gave them at the time was KK+ and AK rather than QQ+

What I do remember clearly was when I did the math afterwards I didn't have anywhere near the equity to make it a call. However, in hindsight I was probably being unduly influenced by already knowing they had AA.

The two hands sort of stuck in my head because during the hand I did contemplate folding KK for a brief second before thinking "only AA beats me so stick it in" rather taking a few seconds to think about it and really assign a proper range during play.

Take 2 seconds and stove KK+, AK vs KK. Still a call.

Originally Posted by eugmac

Take 2 seconds and stove KK+, AK vs KK. Still a call.

So it would seem.

I don't know what I range I put in then as the way I remember it, it was no where near a call. It had to have been KK+ and AKs at the widest and may have been KK+ only. Which, with hindsight is probably too narrow a range anyway and so my call isn't really as bad as I thought.

Having said that, I still clearly remember not giving the decision any real thought during the hand and that's never a good way to play.