|
 Originally Posted by Robb
 Originally Posted by only_bridge
Well, they might have folded to a smaller bet too. And if you make it too small they all call. I always find it difficult to isolate just one opponent in this situation, especially from button.
We've got AA, who wants just one opponent on the flop? If they'll join the party, let 'em.
With this in mind I stoved the following
Code:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 61.956% 61.45% 00.51% 20171833190 166266660.50 { AhAd }
Hand 1: 13.456% 12.81% 00.64% 4206377959 210669361.33 { 22+, A9s+, KJs+, QJs, ATo+ }
Hand 2: 12.571% 11.93% 00.65% 3914602563 212002696.83 { 22+, A7s+, K9s+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KTo+, QJo }
Hand 3: 12.018% 11.34% 00.68% 3722694175 222317210.33 { 22+, A5s+, K9s+, Q9s+, J9s+, A9o+, KTo+, QTo+ }
Assumed that the later players ranges would widen as the pot odds increased, not sure whether I should have left AA KK in though, but from the stats they seemed pretty weak passives so could have been slowplaying.
If they all called the 1$ bet Robb is suggesting , whats the best approach on the flop, now that we are out of position, the pot is bigger than bones stack,and roughly half the other two guys stacks.
Pot sized cbet and calling a shove on a non paired flop or is the shove going to say that they hit their set/straight etc?.
I assume that Spenda's comment meant to shove all in? and if so is that so the Ax hands and big PPs will go all in too? or is it so that only the big PPs who we dominate can afford to put the money in thinking that we are just trying to steal the pot and that they have decent equity against the range they put us on ?.
If in this scenario we had been on the button or even in the blinds as this case was, whats the range we could profitably squeeze with here . Given that it was an UTG min raise and callers all of which are weak passives should or squeezing range be massive here ?.Also is it a case of the worse our hand the bigger our bet should be to deter callers , or would that just be transparent at higher stakes?.
|