07-14-2010 12:45 PM
#76
| |
| |
|
07-14-2010 01:03 PM
#77
| |
Total Votes: | |
Last edited by bigred; 07-14-2010 at 01:05 PM.
| |
|
07-14-2010 01:21 PM
#78
| |
Can we lynch levelfish again to make him extra dead? Pretty please? No? Fine uh.. Hoopy lynch seems fine. I'd be interested to see what happened if people BW'd Penny after that mild overreaction post but whatevs. | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 01:28 PM
#79
| |
if warpe say so lynch hoopey | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 01:30 PM
#80
| |
I'm stickin with my high level BooG lynch. | |
|
07-14-2010 01:41 PM
#81
| |
So Hoopy wasn't really on my radar one bit and I was pretty much ready to post in defense for him...but looking back at his posts, there IS something quite fishy about him. also, as much as I don't like him, dwarfman makes a good point in saying that Penney's post is unnecessarilly and overly defensive. Penney, you were nowhere close to getting lynched, why the defense? | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 01:45 PM
#82
| |
So uhh yeah I spoke to newfish in IRC and apparently he didn't read the rules or anything before signing up. It's kinda my fault actually because he's been sweating me lately and I told him to check out some previous WW games to see if it was his thing, and to sign up if he thought it was. Turns out he skipped directly to step #2. Then disappeared for a week. NH newfish! | |
|
07-14-2010 02:28 PM
#83
| |
Alright here's what I've got. In order to maximize our chances of lynching a wolf, while simultaneously minimizing our chances of lynching a potentially helpful end-game villager, I will use the following criteria for today's lynch: | |
|
07-14-2010 02:43 PM
#84
| |
I like i how i have enough cred that i can just attach warpes name to a wagon and get it going. | |
|
07-14-2010 02:54 PM
#85
| |
Not having any real understanding of the game I was gonna vote to lynch Jeff just to tie it up and make it interesting.Seeing some actual strategy kicking in I'll have to think on it a bit. | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 03:08 PM
#86
| |
| |
|
07-14-2010 03:31 PM
#87
| |
Yea it sure seems some people were keen to have someone to vote for without having to justify it. But how much of that is just not having a clue & liking the easy route of following the experienced players. | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 03:41 PM
#88
| |
|
I'm not sure why you think my nomination of you is interesting btw keith, it's in the super early stages so it's still "basically" a crapshoot but since you decided to get VERY defensive with no real heat and just random lynch posts early in the game this gives me a better reason to stick with my lynch post. |
|
07-14-2010 03:45 PM
#89
| |
| |
|
07-14-2010 03:50 PM
#90
| |
jeff was obviously motivated to A) not have people bandwagon him and B) let people know where the bandwagon was at: mainly not him. | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 03:54 PM
#91
| |
TLR, Don and Boog hit me like they just weren't reading or certainly not understanding what they were reading... | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 03:59 PM
#92
| |
Nope, I remember again why I thought there was nothing here. Firstly, because I was indicted. Secondly, because I'm pretty sure if Warpe came out and said, "for very important reasons, which I can't explain fully, I'm voting this way" people would follow so early in the game. If JKDS said it though, he'd probably get lynched. | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 04:04 PM
#93
| |
To Dan's point, I'm a bit n00bish and trying to learn, and from reading past WW's I think I've gained at least decent confidence in which people know what they're doing. Also, not having subscribed to the thread was a n00b move on my part. I think I can participate a bit more now. | |
|
07-14-2010 04:06 PM
#94
| |
tl;dr Keith and Penney have exposed themselves as nervous and defensive. Let's narrow it down to them. Aim for Keith. | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 04:49 PM
#95
| |
Okay, so this being my first WW game I'll openly admit that I really am at a loss about how the game goes about, especially in the early stages. That being said, I read the last WW thread and the beginning seemed to be a spree of semi-random lynches that narrowed the field of suspects down to some extent. | |
| |
|
07-14-2010 05:52 PM
#96
| |
|
And who started the newfish lynch ...no doubt you'll be using that as well. |
|
07-14-2010 06:42 PM
#97
| |
BANNED
|
I can't see the logic here tbh, and I don't see what exactly I, or anyone else who voted hoopy, has to 'defend'. At that stage, we were still at the stage where random lynchings were the order of the day (things do now seem to have got a little spicy though), so 'warpe voted for him' was literally a good enough reason as any. |
|
07-14-2010 06:46 PM
#98
| |
| |
|
07-14-2010 07:19 PM
#99
| |
| |
|
07-14-2010 07:31 PM
#100
| |
| |
|
07-15-2010 05:03 AM
#101
| |
This is where you're wrong. Looking over my past WWs killing the inactives has netted zero wolves. They're usually just regular villagers who aren't very motivated because they didn't draw anything special. We only go after them as a meta-game strategy to get everyone to contribute. That is why it's better to let them get mod-killed now that we have that option and use our daily lynch on someone that actually has a better chance of being a wolf! | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 08:25 AM
#102
| |
I'm in agreement with rilla here. Penney, Keith, and Dan always seem to post a lot, and Keith is pretty defensive to anyone coming at him at any point in the game. And Dan just so happens to go after Keith 99% of the time. | |
|
07-15-2010 08:46 AM
#103
| |
From playing with Keith as a wolf he can get up to some serious devious shit, so I wouldn't mind lynching him. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 08:49 AM
#104
| |
I'd happily lynch anyone on my list from earlier; I just singled out Avatarkava because he's a WW noob, and a noob wolf is more likely to be quiet than a vet (who might level and try to be extra active, etc). If there is support for a TLR, bode or XTR1k lynch I'd happily switch over. But for now I say we stick with the low-risk, high-reward choice of avatarkava. | |
|
07-15-2010 09:56 AM
#105
| |
This is more to my liking. Bode is imo pretty good at WW so I'd rather go for someone else, but for now. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 10:02 AM
#106
| |
BANNED
|
OK, let's see where this goes today. Still not massively compelled to vote for anyone, but I'm not sure a hoopy lynch is very proactive. |
|
07-15-2010 10:04 AM
#107
| |
Ok I've reread the thread and feel that Bode is a better lynch than Jeff at this point, partly because I don't think Jeff would post "here comes the BW!" if he were a wolf. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 11:08 AM
#108
| |
Meh... the only thing that rubs me the wrong way about this bode lynch is that it's pretty much right up his alley to play this way early in WW games. He's almost never an active contributor early on. Any other vets with me on this? | |
|
07-15-2010 11:13 AM
#109
| |
BANNED
|
The last time I played werewolf here (years ago), bode eventually played a really active and helpful role as a villager. That's why I'm a little reluctant to lynch him at this early stage, just to see if his approach to this game does change at all, so we can get a better read there. |
|
07-15-2010 11:34 AM
#110
| |
I agree with Penny. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 12:03 PM
#111
| |
I just got back from Pennsylvania and have caught up on this thread. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 12:11 PM
#112
| |
Oh, hello page 2. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 12:17 PM
#113
| |
So the theory is that experienced players are quiet early on and shouldn't be lynched, but n00bs are quiet early on and should be lynched. Guess going back and reading through past games to try to get a feel for strategy is working against me in Penny's eyes. Don't waste time killing another villager who is willing to contribute once there's a bit more information available! | |
|
07-15-2010 12:30 PM
#114
| |
BANNED
| |
|
07-15-2010 12:43 PM
#115
| |
Meh. | |
|
07-15-2010 12:45 PM
#116
| |
I just want to make this clear now so it gets some credit: I finally got a job and the company blocks all gambling related interwebs including FTR. Thats why I will be posting less than usual. Thanks for your attention, if you have further questions feel free to ask. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 12:59 PM
#117
| |
Lynch boog.Cuz I don't wanna play w/ him anymore. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 01:04 PM
#118
| |
Well my plan to derail a random wagon to start a different random wagon and then rescind and go 'ha your a wolf' in an effort to get ppl discussing things instead of just going OMG LYNCH HIM seems to have succeeded. | |
|
07-15-2010 02:08 PM
#119
| |
| |
|
07-15-2010 02:20 PM
#120
| |
Bc I fail at multiquote obv | |
|
07-15-2010 02:33 PM
#121
| |
Well nothing much is taking off, but at least we've had a lot of posting from most players. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 03:00 PM
#122
| |
| |
|
07-15-2010 03:02 PM
#123
| |
It wasn't a multiquote because I didn't multiquote it when I was intending to. | |
|
07-15-2010 03:23 PM
#124
| |
|
you were intending to address multiple points if you were intending to multiquote. Where are the follow up posts where you address those extra point that you were going to make? |
|
07-15-2010 03:24 PM
#125
| |
| |
|
07-15-2010 03:40 PM
#126
| |
One point, two posts. | |
|
07-15-2010 04:02 PM
#127
| |
Total Votes: | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 05:34 PM
#128
| |
sorry for not participating as much as some of you, i've been busy and like warpe haven't really had time to follow that closely. I do think everyone is getting way too fired up for the 2nd day of the game. All of the accusation this early in the game can lead to one of 2 things: we either have some solid discussion to analyze once we are further into the game and know who a wolf or 2 is, or we have a clusterfuck of name calling and pointing fingers that just leads to more confusion down the road. more often than not its the latter. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 05:41 PM
#129
| |
lynch hoopy | |
Last edited by AvatarKava; 07-15-2010 at 05:43 PM. | |
|
07-15-2010 06:43 PM
#130
| |
| |
|
07-15-2010 06:51 PM
#131
| |
BANNED
|
A lot of the posts on this day so far are just noise imo. Its day 2 for christ sake, its so so difficult to be solidly pointing fingers at all atm. Although it is a good thing that we're getting this level of discussion even at this stage I guess - this will probably be a good game of werewolf when things get interesting. |
|
07-15-2010 07:51 PM
#132
| |
Avatar and Hoopy tied at 6 votes a piece | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 08:38 PM
#133
| |
sorry I have been quiet guys but got absolutely slammed at work (7 hours of sleep over the last 2 days imo). I will catch up on the thread tonight and post again, but will then be quiet again through the weekend cuz I am off to my high school reunion. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 09:03 PM
#134
| |
read through a couple of things and honestly don't like either lynch going. Gonna look over some more stuff | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 09:05 PM
#135
| |
I really haven't got this game worked out yet.This may be premature but reading through the thread I get the vibe that Hoopy and Jeff are in kahoots together.I know that they voted to lynch eachother but that could just be strategy.The fact that they rescinded eachother within 2 minutes kinda reinforces this.I'll wait a bit to rescind my last vote but I'm thinking that if we lynch Hoopy and find out he is a wolf than we have even more reason to suspect Jeff for the next lynching. | |
| |
|
07-15-2010 09:30 PM
#136
| |
| |
| |
|
07-15-2010 09:42 PM
#137
| |
have read enough to know that I want to lynch donachello (although I would miss seeing his avatar). | |
| |
|
07-16-2010 04:17 AM
#138
| |
BANNED
| |
|
07-16-2010 05:44 AM
#139
| |
Well it looks like it's coming down to either AK or Hoopy, (sadly there's not much happening with regard to keith, and a couple of regs have made positive comments about both Keith & Penny, so I think those bandwagons are dead before they started). | |
| |
|
07-16-2010 06:13 AM
#140
| |
Sigh the only reason I vote/rescinded/re voted newfish was because we were at 9 votes and didn't want the BW to get to 11 without giving him the chance to say "OMG I iz da seer guyz" or whatever. Then JKDS said he hadn't been on FTR in 7 days, so he'd probably forgotten about the game and would be modkilled, better to lynch him then and pray he wasn't a special. | |
| |
|
07-16-2010 07:31 AM
#141
| |
rescind hoopy | |
| |
|
07-16-2010 09:46 AM
#142
| |
Yeah... DC hasn't exactly been rubbing me the right way either. He's pretty much shut up after putting in his BW vote in a perfunctory manner and seems to want to wait till teh day closes given that two bandwagons have taken off. Very much in the Avatarkava mold. | |
|
07-16-2010 09:48 AM
#143
| |
|
07-16-2010 10:57 AM
#144
| |
Hey guys, just wanted to throw my two cents in again. | |
| |
|
07-16-2010 11:15 AM
#145
| |
BANNED
| |
|
07-16-2010 11:18 AM
#146
| |
|
07-16-2010 12:06 PM
#147
| |
| |
|
07-16-2010 12:53 PM
#148
| |
It seems we've hit a stalemate. There doesn't seem to be anybody wanting to change votes. In the interest of getting the ball rolling again (and because he's only posted once): | |
| |
|
07-16-2010 01:21 PM
#149
| |
|
07-16-2010 01:23 PM
#150
| |
I can happily switch to either TLR or donachello. | |
|