|
Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
I have clearly stated that my policy vote against wuf was a policy vote, and he's not showing signs of that policy.
No one cares about your initial policy vote. Its anti-village and poor strategy, but its not role-indicative for you. I only quoted it because its exactly how you started last game and triggered the same response from wufwugy.
I like people who inject fun and smiles into WW, while contributing to the hunt. Wuf's first post was along that line.
I don't remember wuf starting like that last game, but I concede that you're probably right about it.
I dont see how this equates to twisting your intent.
What wuf has done since that opening post is a stark contrast to what he was doing last game on D1.
I stand by my actions here. I decided to open with the line about wuf a couple of games ago. Then last game, it proved a good move. Now this game it looks different. I'm not going to blindly adhere to a pseudo-punishment of wuf when he is helping out the village.
What wuf has done since is irrelevant. You, a scientist, witnessed two events. In each, you policy lynched wuf. In each, he responded with a gif/video. Yet even though Wuf was a wolf in the first event, you gave him villager cred in the second.
So I'll ask again, where is the part where I twisted your intent? The fact is I didnt twist your intent, which begs the question of why you said I did.
|