|
Originally Posted by OngBonga
This game is different seeing as we have a reviver. We should probably lynch someone who will be useful if revived. Bikes is better than pascal on this basis, but he'd need to at least convince the reviver that he's going to participate. Dan has made it clear that before he modkills, he will warn us well in advance. If that warning comes, then we should consider lynching. Until then, voting for them is a wasted vote imo.
But if a player is modkilled for inactivity, how could they have possibly convinced us that they would be useful to revive? Sounds like a catch 22.
You do make a good point, though -- if Rong will give us ample warning, we can ignore the inactives until they are under threat of modkilling. Although with 2 inactives, we might want to kill off one of them and then ignore the other, so we don't end up sitting on day 2 with 2 potential modkills looming. Yes/no?
I've only played with bikes once before, and his attitude was "nothing good happens in the first 3 days, wake me later" (he was on the villager side, he might have been a special -- too lazy to check). So I'm inclined to think that bikes' inactivity means he's an uninterested villager -- so, I guess....
rescind bikes, lynch pascal
|