|
|
He played his hand pretty poorly. With the limpers in front of you, he should've reraised to about 250 or so and get everyone else out of the pot. You'd call (or maybe reraise / shove), and then he could lead at the pot for lets say 350 - 400, and he'd be getting your stack, with you probably reraising all in immediately (and if not, likely calling an all in on the turn). He'd still get paid off (actually more so), without all the risk of letting so many people see the flop.
But forgetting what he actually had, if I considered him a decent player, I'd probably call this, the way it was played out, because it doesn't make sense why he's playing a hand that beats you so fast here, without raising preflop. It looks like an open ended straight draw, AK, or a K that's misread your flop bet or something ...
Although if I considered him a bad player (but not the passive type that only bets big with big hands), I'd probably call even faster, as he easily could have any K or lower pocket pair that he can't lay down. I think its debatable that a very good player would typically only make this play with an open ended straight draw or AK.
A set SURELY would be played slower, and I'd have to think KJ would be as well (call and then check raise all in on turn would be much more effective for both), and that basically just leaves AA as the only hand that beats you here.
If it weren't for the limpers, or if this were a blind war (SB vs. BB), AA would make a lot more sense.
|