What would you define as crushing SnG's, ITM and ROI?
06-23-2005 10:46 AM
#1
| |
crushing SnG's?What would you define as crushing SnG's, ITM and ROI? | |
| |
06-23-2005 11:00 AM
#2
| |
I think ROI is the defining stat and I personally think 25%+ is very good and 40%+ is crushing the game. | |
06-23-2005 05:07 PM
#3
| |
well i don't think anyone could keep a 25% roi over a long period of time say of 5000 sng's. I see people syaying im pimping sng's i have 48% ROI. How many have you played? 4. | |
06-23-2005 05:08 PM
#4
| |
Interesting, how many SnG's have you played to come up with this conclusion? | |
| |
06-23-2005 05:23 PM
#5
| |
You asked my opinion and I gave it, I never said it was fact. Ask DaveSimon and Radashack if you can maintain an ROI of higher than 25% and I promise you they will say yes. | |
06-23-2005 05:24 PM
#6
| |
I agree. My statement was towards muxy. | |
| |
06-23-2005 06:31 PM
#7
| |
|
i STILL stand by the 2+2 people, who have played more SNGs than I am sure anyone else here has. |
06-23-2005 06:36 PM
#8
| |
It was a different subject. Its also pointless to regurgitate 2+2 and then state "I have my sources". | |
| |
06-23-2005 06:46 PM
#9
| |
Yes the blind structure makes a HUGE difference. You just cannot compare ROI on party sngs with ROI on PS sngs. | |
06-23-2005 06:54 PM
#10
| |
|
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...=&fpart=2&vc=1 |
06-23-2005 07:18 PM
#11
| |
|
I'm confident that I could maintain a 50-75% ROI at the $1.10 SNGs, but this makes no money. Move up to the $5.50's and for a while I was at 50% ROI. But if anyone can attest to the fact that you can't maintain this, it's me. |
| |
06-23-2005 08:02 PM
#12
| |
The biggest problem I have with Irieguy is that he says his post is opinion based on data....that he has no interest in proving his statemens. Then he proceeds to state things as fact.....because he is the authority on the subject. He acknowledges contradictory data, but says he doesn't care about that data because it does not support my conclusions or conflicts with the data he chooses to pay attention to. | |
06-23-2005 08:06 PM
#13
| |
You assumed wrong. I was wanting to know what everyone thought was crushing the game. You said you were crushing the $10's at bodog. Since I dont know what crushing means, I just thought Id ask. | |
| |
06-23-2005 08:32 PM
#14
| |
|
DavSimon, I understand the issues that you have with Irieguys post. I have the same issue in questioning the validity of his statement, becase as one poster pointed out in that thread, his 10,000 SNGs were spread out over many different levels, and even 10k SNGs isnt a very big sample size. It is his opinion on that issue based on a questionable sample. However, in the end after many reading many posts on this subject, and hearing people such as daliman and gigabet, both very succesful players (gigabet recently placed 5th in a WSOP tourney might have been PLO), recount their statistics playing in the 200s and above, I have come to my own [attempt italics] opinion [end attempted italics] that over a very long term 20% ROI at high levels constitutes crushing the game. |
06-23-2005 08:33 PM
#15
| |
I'd say davsimmon is running well ontop of crushing the game. I mean he almost literally wrote the book on sit n goes. | |
| |
06-24-2005 07:18 AM
#16
| |
|
I agree with bmxcicles statement. |
06-24-2005 10:36 AM
#17
| |
Yea my bad. sorry for snapping back. I tend to get on the defensive bro, no worries. | |
| |
07-26-2005 02:57 AM
#18
| |
Im running an amazing 80% ROI at the $22's on UB. This is over 52 SnG's which is not a huge sample but I think it's big enough to prove I can win consitently which I am proud of. I've had a lot of good fortune over this run but I still think over the long haul 50% is completely possible. | |
| |
07-26-2005 10:30 AM
#19
| |
Its really not. I'm not saying your a bad player, but I had a 59% ITM and a 78% ROI for a long time. Its easy to get those numbers in a 50 SnG block. Play about 300 and its almost impossible, trust me I tried. Over 373 SnG's, I am running around a 40% ROI. You keep forgetting its not all about your play. Varience will hit eventually. You will have 1 month where you think you forgot how to play. AJ loses to AQ with an J high flop. That one card flush kills you every time. The only way to maintain a decent ROI is to not lose your head when this happens. If you do on tilt, it only makes the numbers drop further. | |
| |
07-26-2005 10:50 AM
#20
| |
Did you mean: variance | |
07-26-2005 11:06 AM
#21
| |
No I was talking about something else. | |
| |
07-26-2005 12:15 PM
#22
| |
|
|
07-26-2005 12:36 PM
#23
| |
| |
| |
07-26-2005 12:38 PM
#24
| |
|
Your ROI will suffer when one day every time you get it headsup, your opponent sucks out on u every hand. You dont get a first for like 19 tourneys, even though you consistently maintain >35% ITM. THAT is also variance. |
07-26-2005 02:05 PM
#25
| |
Im sorry, but a 50% ROI is nearly impossible at even the 11's. A lot of people run hot for 100-200 sng's and have a 40 or so ROI but long run it is not possible. I revanmped my sng game recently and started from scratch and and started at the 11's about 100 games about 40% ROI, then moved to the 22"s and had about a 35% ROI after 100 or so games, it dropped to 22% and the 33's and now at the 55's im running about 17%. THe only way I see a 40+ ROI over the long haul is at maybe a 1-3 dollar sng's with total donks. I think people saying a 50+ ROI is possible have not played enough games to really back this up. | |
07-26-2005 03:10 PM
#26
| |
It strongly depends on what site you are playing on.. Starting chips, blind level increments, and player skills are going to have a very strong affect on your stats. At a party skin 45% ROI is impossible to achieve, period. I play mainly party skins and would say crushing the game at the highest limits for regular SnG's (200$) would be high teens. | |
07-26-2005 05:57 PM
#27
| |
Yeah I think your hourly rate divided by your buy in would be a statistic that can be used to compare accross different blind structures. HROI if you will... | |
07-26-2005 06:15 PM
#28
| |
|
sounds like a sore subject, but i'm embarking on a 500 sng quest on party at the 30+3$ 3-table sng's. I'll post my results in here every 100. so far doing really well, but I'm sure the variance is really going to affect these one's as you have to get thru many more coinflips per tourny. If all go's well i may just keep on playing these. |
07-26-2005 06:23 PM
#29
| |
Good luck bud, I am very interested to hear about your results. What is your time frame? | |
| |
07-26-2005 06:56 PM
#30
| |
The structure on UB is much better to achieve consistent finishes because you start with 1500 chips and blinds go up every 10 minutes. | |
| |
07-26-2005 07:17 PM
#31
| |
im a noob and gotta ask, when you say ROI i assume you are using your averages... invest in 5+1 and u take it down for 45$ is your ROI 700%? | |
07-26-2005 07:38 PM
#32
| |
I've run +45 and -35 over a few hundred 215s. | |
07-26-2005 08:25 PM
#33
| |
Samples are never big enough | |
| |
07-26-2005 08:27 PM
#34
| |
| |
07-26-2005 09:04 PM
#35
| |
|
I suckI suck at sit n go tourneys. I get to board siting there for so long. Ring games are for me. Preferably limit games so I don't get out of control. I get impatient. |
07-27-2005 12:35 AM
#36
| |
| |
| |
07-27-2005 02:54 PM
#37
| |
| |
| |
07-27-2005 02:59 PM
#38
| |
| |
| |
07-27-2005 03:02 PM
#39
| |
| |
07-27-2005 03:18 PM
#40
| |
| |
03-29-2007 08:21 PM
#41
| |
|
|
03-29-2007 10:46 PM
#42
| |
lol | |
| |
03-29-2007 10:50 PM
#43
| |
|
Now there's a bump - more than 1.5 years between the last post on the original thread and the bump, is that a record? |
03-29-2007 11:29 PM
#44
| |
|
thats what i was going for. |
03-30-2007 12:13 PM
#45
| |
45%??? lolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll | |
| |
03-31-2007 02:55 PM
#46
| |
He could have better results on a different site. | |
03-31-2007 04:34 PM
#47
| |
hmmm... | |