Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,291,000 Posts!
Poker ForumTournament Poker

24 FO Pair vs 4 flush

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Default 24 FO Pair vs 4 flush

    I'm 22/15 but that is 130 hands at table, villain is 26/10 over 39 hands, I have been folding a lot since he has been at table, no big pots either way.

    Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em Tournament, 150/300 Blinds 25 Ante (9 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

    MP2 (t4367)
    MP3 (t5766)
    CO (t12897)
    Button (t20059)
    SB (t10088)
    Hero (BB) (t9563)
    UTG (t5264)
    UTG+1 (t8260)
    MP1 (t25182)

    Hero's M: 14.17

    Preflop: Hero is BB with A, 6
    4 folds, MP3 calls t300, 2 folds, SB calls t150, Hero checks

    Flop: (t1125) 4, J, A (3 players)
    SB checks, Hero checks, MP3 bets t600, 1 fold, Hero calls t600

    Turn: (t2325) A (2 players)
    Hero checks, MP3 checks

    River: (t2325) 3 (2 players)
    Hero checks, MP3 bets t1050, Hero?
  2. #2
    How come no lead out on river... The way the hand's played out, I would think a flush would be totally believable from villain's POV..?

    Anyhow I have to think on your 'as played' but I'm leaning towards a fold, even if villain could be betting very weak knowing better will fold often

    Raising isn't an option unless we want to rep the absolute top range of 33 or 44 given the way the hand has played out, right? Total spew..? Can we assume a call from high/nut flush if we pushed here or are players a bit more savvy at these levels
  3. #3
    all-in
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Penneywize View Post
    Raising isn't an option unless we want to rep the absolute top range of 33 or 44 given the way the hand has played out, right? Total spew..? Can we assume a call from high/nut flush if we pushed here or are players a bit more savvy at these levels
    Quote Originally Posted by baudib View Post
    all-in
    Question answered, heh.
  5. #5
    obviously we have 0 equity vs. his calling range but i think we are good here a non-trivial amount of time...we can't expect him to fold Ks/Qs (I think most of them bet the turn) but he'll be hard-pressed to call with, say, red AT and maybe he'll fold a Jc9s. he doesn't seem to want to play big pots so we have a lot of fold equity, maybe even a stupid amount.

    edit: i expect him to have a FH here just about never.
    Last edited by baudib; 03-19-2010 at 06:10 PM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  6. #6
    I call, limpy fish love their suited hands and I don't think he has that many one-spade hands in his range. Also he seems too passive to be value betting without at least the queen. All-in is ridiculous.
  7. #7
    this is really close, i'd prob call.

    I actually think shove is kind of interesting you have to feel that he's folding everything but Ks or better tho.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •