Unless Villains can see your cards, you're making connections that just don't make sense. If you only 4-bet AA, then you would still expect a certain %age of shoves, another %age of non-shove raises, another %age of calls, etc...
Also, it sounds like you are generalizing all villains into a single player here.
here I think its just the way ive been running. it seems like everytime lately the villians have had my number no matter the situation. but in perspective it seems to be just variance. I was generalizing because I don't really have a specific opp type in mind. Just how my opening range stacks up to a villians 3b value range.
It's way too wide for even your widest adjustment (Say it out loud: "13% from UTG is spew").
LMAO
You're losing so much money with those small PP's and SC's. These are hands that play well IP, and that are 0EV at best from OOP.
Something like this: { 88+,ATs+,KJs+,QJs,AQo+ } should be your baseline, which is 7% of hands. You should definitely be willing to fold some of those hands to a 3-bet.
point well taken. I won a lot more money before I started "balancing" my range with SCs. I think for the time being im going to remove those from my UTG and MP ranges for awhile to see if my winrate changes. should be interesting.
I play FR mainly (but that's my MP2 range, which is the same distance from the BTN as UTG in 6-max), so grain of salt with the specifics in there, but I think it's obv. you are getting yourself into bad situations by over-valuing hands OOP.
They're only confusing you and distracting you from the major lesson of the micros: learn to identify fat value (as opposed to thin value) and V-bet the shit out of it.
makes sense.
Read this:
spoonitnow's Mathematics of EV Thread
Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
Unless Villains can see your cards, you're making connections that just don't make sense. If you only 4-bet AA, then you would still expect a certain %age of shoves, another %age of non-shove raises, another %age of calls, etc...
Reply With Quote