Thanks for your comments.

Hand 2 and 4 seem to be the most interesting ones.

Hand 2 I thought his 3-bet range was wide, I had no information about his 4-bet calling/shoving range so I assumed it was standard tight. IMO (correct me if I'm wrong) it can't be very bad to call the 3-bet IP with AA and go all in on lots of flops.

But yeah, at least go all-in on it then!
My reasoning at the time was a flop shove would have folded anything but KK, AQ, KQ. Turn pairing the Q made a Q in villains range less likely, and also in my range. I shoved because I expected to get called lighter, at least by JJ+, maybe more. I also thought I would be well ahead of that range, but as I Pokerstoved it I see I can't be that sure:

Board: 7c 2s Qh Qd
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 47.727% 45.80% 01.92% 524 22.00 { AcAh }
Hand 1: 52.273% 50.35% 01.92% 576 22.00 { JJ+, AQs, KQs, AQo, KQo }
Board: 7c 2s Qh Qd
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 62.799% 61.48% 01.32% 1028 22.00 { AcAh }
Hand 1: 37.201% 35.89% 01.32% 600 22.00 { 99+, AQs, KQs, AQo, KQo }
Hand 4 I don't have a really good idea of villains range at the turn. Villain is obviously bad, but very passive as well. If somebody can put a possible range together for me that would be great; or some probabilty of TP/2pairs/straights/draws.