Tell me where I am going wrong!!!!!

Should I check the turn here and bet the river after he checks? As played is this standard?


Game #3593162483: Hold'em NL ($0.15/$0.25) - 2007/03/25 - 16:04:01 (GMT)
Table "BrandonManitoba" Seat 2 is the button.
Seat 1: golfman9 ($21.60 in chips)
Seat 2: Sp0ngeman ($23.50 in chips)
Seat 3: TheFish ($24.75 in chips)
Seat 4: Don_craig ($8.10 in chips)
Seat 5: Bigclout1 ($8.95 in chips)
Seat 6: Hero ($24.60 in chips)
TheFish: posts small blind $0.15
Don_craig: posts big blind $0.25
----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to boonjob [Ah Jd]
Bigclout1: calls $0.25
Hero: raises to $1.25
golfman9: folds
Sp0ngeman: folds
TheFish: folds
Don_craig: folds
Bigclout1: calls $1
----- FLOP ----- [Ac Kc Kh]
Hero: bets $1.50
Bigclout1: calls $1.50
----- TURN ----- [Ac Kc Kh][Tc]
Bigclout1: checks
Hero: bets $3.75
Bigclout1: calls $3.75
----- RIVER ----- [Ac Kc Kh Tc][5h]
Bigclout1: checks
Hero: checks

I think that is fine. If anything I'd bet the river, but the board completes a lot of his hands, so I think checking is fine.

against an avg player at 25nl I think I would check the flop and vbet the turn and river.

Checking is o.k. without reads.

If villain is at all cally I'd fire 1/2 pot on river even though it s kind of thin.

bet river all the time, you beat all aces except AQ AK AT.

look at his stack

Originally Posted by gabe

bet river all the time, you beat all aces except AQ AK AT.

look at his stack

I was thinking this yesterday while I was out. There is a good chance he he holds a smaller A than me a lot of the time here.

The stack size is actually something I completely missed. I should have just stuck it all in on the river. Missed value there then?