|
|
 Originally Posted by will641
heres why that theory sucks. if you limp suited connectors (which is what your saying right?) then you have to start limping your betting hands so you arent totally predictable. its better to raise because you steal blinds a lot and you have a very likely chance of taking down the pot, especially if they are bad, because most bad players c/f most flops.
as papal said i would be interested to see if my reasoning seems good to the better players.
If they are bad, they will fold most hands and u'll take the blinds, and calling, they will mostly c/f most flops, correct.
But isn't it theoretically better to allow those bad players to see more flops against you, when you are better and have position, thus allowing them to make more 'mistakes' in different streets?
Allowing them to get married to top pair weak kicker when you flop a straight, etc.... may give more profit than just winning the blinds?
By raising, you almost force them to play correctly? folding most hands, reraising with big hands...
The only mistakes you get from them are when they call oop with marginal hands and then fold to your c-bet.
Of course, this strategy would need to be balanced so as not to give up your hands, occasionally raising w those hands and limping with others.
I don't know, Just wondering out loud
|
Reply With Quote