TOTALLY WRONGOriginally Posted by drmcboy
(Edit for me being dumb)
06-04-2007 11:17 PM
#76
| |
| |
| |
06-04-2007 11:36 PM
#77
| |
| |
06-05-2007 12:33 AM
#78
| |
lol, maybe a year ago #7 was questionable but it's a pretty solid rule for games Americans can play now | |
| |
06-05-2007 01:46 AM
#79
| |
The 3/6 games blow..... | |
| |
06-05-2007 12:11 PM
#80
| |
| |
| |
06-05-2007 01:56 PM
#81
| |
| |
| |
06-05-2007 02:01 PM
#82
| |
From what i can tell...these rules are all still really good to build a 6-max game around but rule number 7 should be somewhat situation and read dependent. That sound good? | |
| |
06-18-2007 07:31 PM
#83
| |
This post has probably cost me like 20k in EV. | |
| |
07-06-2007 04:28 AM
#84
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
07-06-2007 04:16 PM
#85
| |
its not just preflop stats... they can have normal looking stats and play bad postflop. | |
07-14-2007 06:59 AM
#86
| |
lol at people complaining about why this isn't stickied anymore IN THE HIGH STAKES FORUM, if someone can follow this to a T and beat any reasonably tough game for any reasonable sample, get back to me and i will reconsider | |
07-14-2007 10:26 AM
#87
| |
| |
07-14-2007 12:48 PM
#88
| |
lukie do you even beat or play high stakes | |
07-14-2007 02:12 PM
#89
| |
Move it to shnl because these guidelines beat pretty much all low stakes games. | |
| |
07-15-2007 02:16 AM
#90
| |
| |
07-15-2007 02:26 AM
#91
| |
renton what?? | |
07-15-2007 12:06 PM
#92
| |
| |
| |
07-15-2007 12:27 PM
#93
| |
at 1/2 on stars you will lose if you follow these guidelines directly. | |
07-15-2007 12:40 PM
#94
| |
Well it beat .5/1 for me. Max can vouch for that. | |
| |
07-20-2007 01:22 AM
#95
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
07-20-2007 12:42 PM
#96
| |
| |
| |
07-20-2007 03:31 PM
#97
| |
wow 5000 hands? | |
07-20-2007 04:27 PM
#98
| |
1. should probably be changed to PFR between 12-18% no? | |
| |
07-21-2007 02:54 AM
#99
| |
![]() ![]()
|
yeah, even higher too works for some |
07-31-2008 05:23 PM
#100
| |
Maintain somehwere between a 15-25% vpip and 7-15% PFR. | |
| |
07-31-2008 06:21 PM
#101
| |
yes | |
08-02-2008 12:47 PM
#102
| |
| |
| |
01-27-2009 09:18 AM
#103
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
04-28-2016 04:14 PM
#104
| |
My goodness. The sick part is that you actually could make $100k a year, easily, playing like this at this point in time. | |
| |
04-29-2016 04:06 PM
#105
| |
good times | |
| |
05-05-2016 12:05 PM
#106
| |
| |
09-16-2016 10:21 AM
#107
| |
4-6 seem hit-or-miss too, with 4 being especially dated. | |