What do you guys think is a decent hourly rate at .25/.50nl 6 max 3 tables.
same question for .50/1nl
01-04-2010 12:09 PM
#1
| |
|
hourly rateWhat do you guys think is a decent hourly rate at .25/.50nl 6 max 3 tables. |
| |
01-04-2010 12:44 PM
#2
| |
with rakeback? probably $25/40 | |
| |
01-04-2010 01:51 PM
#3
| |
I play full ring, so my estimation may be off for 6-max, but you can use it as reference. I play 6 tables full ring @ $100NL and I'm making about $22 an hour WITHOUT considering bonuses on PokerStars. I consider my results to be at least "decent" if not better. If you simply divided my hourly rate by 2 to compensate for the lower $50NL stake and then divide it by 2 again to account for 3 tables instead of the 6 I usually play, you get $6.25 an hour. | |
| |
01-04-2010 09:12 PM
#4
| |
it was a rough guess, but after i dropped down to nl100 this summer, i made ~$75/hour 8 tabling after rakeback, and i think that was at like 4ptbb/100. | |
| |
01-04-2010 11:47 PM
#5
| |
|
I think it's pretty impossible for an 100nl reg to make >50/hr playing 100nl. You'd have to play a ton of tables (>14)and play very well, I was never able to break 50 an hour even when I was demolishing 100nl 8 tabling last March. I never beat 1/2 for more than 75/hr either, 50-60 was more realistic. |
01-05-2010 03:43 AM
#6
| |
5BB/100 at 100nl is $10 every 100 hands, so if you play 500 hands an hour, that is $50/hour without including rakeback. And 5BB/100 is easily attainable at 100nl imo. | |
01-05-2010 06:13 PM
#7
| |
|
Re-read my post, I said for a 100nl reg it's pretty impossible. If I went and played 100nl now I'm pretty sure I could do it, as could most regs at higher stakes ... |
01-05-2010 09:18 PM
#8
| |
Marshall, 8 tabling nl100 is like 700 hands/hour and at 4ptbb/100 gets you just shy of $60 and $15 in rakeback or so. Not that hard at all. I get what your saying about moving up though, i've just felt comfortable after dropping down and since i have limited time to play now, i like the easy money nl100 gets me without a ton of variance. | |
| |
01-07-2010 06:49 PM
#9
| |
|
i'm 8 tabling 1/2 and am averaging around 550 hands an hour (700 seems way too much unless people make insta decisions non stop) |
01-08-2010 02:55 AM
#10
| |
550 hands 8 tabling is quite low isn't it? | |
01-08-2010 06:45 AM
#11
| |
yeah, 550 hands/hr is way low for 8 tabling. is there somewhere to check in HEM? i usually play ~1 hr sessions and i get 650-700 per session usually on FTP. | |
| |
01-08-2010 11:27 AM
#12
| |
|
i dont think it's low at all. |
01-08-2010 01:47 PM
#13
| |
The software is gonna have something to do with that as well. I'm certain you can get more hands/hour on stars compared to euro sites if you are table selecting the exact same way. | |
| |
01-08-2010 01:48 PM
#14
| |
i dont think anyone is criticizing you, just thought the hands/hour was low. | |
| |
01-08-2010 02:28 PM
#15
| |
Go into HEM, click on Sessions, and it will show you how many minutes you have played for each session. At the bottom it will show you the total hours you have played for the day/month/year etc... Just divide your hands by your hours and you get your hands per hour! | |
01-08-2010 02:41 PM
#16
| |
|
sure here it is from this month: |
01-08-2010 10:56 PM
#17
| |
decent rate is 4bb/100, for you: | |
01-08-2010 10:59 PM
#18
| |
| |
01-09-2010 12:28 AM
#19
| |
I don't see the funny | |
01-09-2010 02:23 AM
#20
| |
Time for some prop bets imo. | |
| |
01-09-2010 02:35 AM
#21
| |
|
sure what do people wanna bet on |
01-09-2010 09:32 AM
#22
| |
finally checked HEM. since july of last year, i'm avg. 645 hands/hr and thats ~25% 6 tabling ~75% 8 tabling FTP. | |
| |
01-09-2010 01:17 PM
#23
| |
|
maybe you play 5 hours at a time without taking a break. i simply cant do that. my sessions are rarely longer than 2 - 2 1/2 hours and it always takes time to get back up to fullspeed when you do a few sessions a day. |
01-10-2010 04:00 AM
#24
| |
| |
01-10-2010 07:01 PM
#25
| |
| |
01-10-2010 09:24 PM
#26
| |
5BB/100 at 100nl? I don't think I could do that. | |
| |
01-10-2010 11:30 PM
#27
| |
?? why is 5BB not attainable at 100nl, when it prob is even at 400nl? | |
| |
01-11-2010 08:54 AM
#28
| |
I think its possible to maintain that with huge tableselection, by very select few. However I dont think its easily maintainable, like you said in your prev post. | |
01-11-2010 10:01 AM
#29
| |
| |
| |
01-11-2010 10:02 AM
#30
| |
I'll take the under side of the prop bet as well. | |
| |
01-11-2010 10:29 AM
#31
| |
sigh, guess ill have to go for it if there's a decent amount of action? | |
| |
01-11-2010 10:49 AM
#32
| |
| |
| |
01-11-2010 10:57 AM
#33
| |
ISF, I think the propbet is for 100NL | |
01-11-2010 11:00 AM
#34
| |
Yea I was 5.5ptbb over >400k hands of 2/5-50/100 (mostly 2/5-5/10 though). Then I switched sites a lot so i don't know exactly, but currently 4.5ptbb on my new site (non-euro), and could be better if I 6 tabled with game selection instead of 12-16 tabling. | |
| |
01-11-2010 11:12 AM
#35
| |
That's pretty sick Alexos considering you play that many tables. | |
01-11-2010 11:15 AM
#36
| |
Yea, I don't think its THAT uncommon though, especially in these days where higher stakes run less often than they used to, a lot of players just churn in high winrates at midstakes instead of moving up. | |
| |
01-11-2010 11:40 PM
#37
| |
| |
01-11-2010 11:57 PM
#38
| |
never said its easily attainable, just that it is more common than you guys seem to think | |
| |
01-12-2010 09:57 AM
#39
| |
I would definitely bet against anyone besides a high stakes guy doing 5ptBB/100 at 100nl. | |
| |
01-12-2010 12:02 PM
#40
| |
| |
| |
01-12-2010 02:19 PM
#41
| |
| |
| |
01-12-2010 09:48 PM
#42
| |
| |
01-12-2010 10:15 PM
#43
| |
|
here's a good idea, if you're very comfy with 100nl, dont just say well i got the br to play 200nl or whatever, why not just make 1/3 or 1/2 your tables 200nl - and just find REALLY good tables at the higher stakes. |
01-12-2010 10:15 PM
#44
| |
| |
| |
01-13-2010 12:40 AM
#45
| |
| |
01-14-2010 01:13 AM
#46
| |
|
$20-40 sounds like a good range to me albeit a huge one |
01-14-2010 10:46 AM
#47
| |
ZwiFT, | |
| |
01-14-2010 03:52 PM
#48
| |
| |