|
|
 Originally Posted by Renton
Couldn't one think that leading flops is always "terrible" in the sense that its always suboptimal to checking?
I'm not saying I believe this, I'm just saying it is possible for a play to always be suboptimal. For example, c/c and lead is a play that 90% of the time isn't good when compared to all the other options. Or open limping.
One might suggest that leading dilutes your other flop ranges, making it harder to c/r or c/c a balanced range.
that's exactly the point I made and it would be almost true if the pfr had a stronger range every time
but in situations like BU vs. blinds, the blinds actually have a stronger range so it makes sense that leading flops is a good way to play flops that will get checked back by the pfr like if you have 99 on 862r
but in the case of an UTG opener his range is so strong he's more likely to cbet air even on such a board
|
Reply With Quote