What should I do here?

Villain is TAG

What should I do here, and why?

***** Hand History for Game 2358503393 *****
$200 NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, July 13, 18:57:26 EDT 2005
Table Table 36682 (Real Money)
Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 2: lenoluck10 ( $245.75 )
Seat 3: innitm8 ( $187.70 )
Seat 5: pardeka ( $110.75 )
Seat 6: Scottbarzoe ( $197 )
Seat 9: Paphjort ( $63.80 )
Seat 8: Kingfish__ ( $221.95 )
Seat 10: Plitie ( $199.55 )
Seat 7: early_man ( $201 )
Seat 4: Sister_Marge ( $77 )
Seat 1: El_Judge ( $201 )
El_Judge posts small blind [$1].
lenoluck10 posts big blind [$2].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Kingfish__ [ Ad Th ]
innitm8 folds.
Sister_Marge folds.
pardeka folds.
Scottbarzoe folds.
early_man folds.
Kingfish__ raises [$6].
Paphjort calls [$6].
Plitie folds.
El_Judge folds.
>You have options at Table 48817 Table!.
lenoluck10 calls [$4].
** Dealing Flop ** [ Ac, Kd, 4c ]
lenoluck10 checks.
Kingfish__ bets [$12].
Paphjort calls [$12].
lenoluck10 folds.
** Dealing Turn ** [ Js ]
Kingfish__ bets [$50].
Paphjort is all-In [$45.80]
** Dealing River ** [ 5c ]
Kingfish__ shows [ Ad, Th ] a pair of aces.
Paphjort shows [ Kh, As ] two pairs, aces and kings.
Kingfish__ wins $4.20 from side pot #1 with a pair of aces.
Paphjort wins $131.60 from the main pot with two pairs, aces and kings.

At the tables I play at which are a bit tighter than your style, I definately wouldn't give A10 as much credit as you did here. I personally would have bet a bit more on the flop and backed off if he was calling. And when the Jack fell I would have definately check/folded.

But from what I understand I play a lot tighter than you do in rings. That's just my play.

Originally Posted by Galapogos

At the tables I play at which are a bit tighter than your style, I definately wouldn't give A10 as much credit as you did here. I personally would have bet a bit more on the flop and backed off if he was calling. And when the Jack fell I would have definately check/folded.

But from what I understand I play a lot tighter than you do in rings. That's just my play.

If you are going to get let yourself get bullied around if an A or T falls by a shortstack.. why raise at all?

Originally Posted by spino1i

Originally Posted by Galapogos

At the tables I play at which are a bit tighter than your style, I definately wouldn't give A10 as much credit as you did here. I personally would have bet a bit more on the flop and backed off if he was calling. And when the Jack fell I would have definately check/folded.

But from what I understand I play a lot tighter than you do in rings. That's just my play.

If you are going to get let yourself get bullied around if an A or T falls by a shortstack.. why raise at all?

Yeah in a tourney I might follow that thought, but I play different in ring games, also, I wouldn't really consider him a shortstack at that point anyway. But like I said, not a lot of bullies floating around in my games that I have to worry about.

If I was playing LAgg, I'd be prepared to drop any ace in a heartbeat. I'd only play AQ /AK for hand value and the rest just for being aggro. You raise with hands like 86 and others becuase you can give the image like you can play anything but by not playing aces, you never get trapped by stronger aces. I dunno, difficult to put my thoughts to words right now. I'm completely exhausted and I dunno why. Try and figure out what I'm saying. Uh, play weak hands for post flop value and deception, fold weak aces becuase you will probably get trapped, play strong aces for value.

I'm sure I'll come back to this tomorrow. I dunno where I'm going.

-'rilla