{This post has been removed}
02-20-2005 03:08 AM
#1
| |
Guest
|
setting a sweetheart of a trap{This post has been removed} |
02-20-2005 03:33 AM
#2
| |
Stop buying in for the default at those tables. You should develop a strong deep-stack game and consider that your loose pre-flop play becomes less of an issue when the money gets really deep. | |
| |
02-20-2005 03:37 AM
#3
| |
Guest
|
{This post has been removed} |
02-20-2005 03:38 AM
#4
| |
It's all about money baby! | |
| |
02-20-2005 03:41 AM
#5
| |
Guest
|
{This post has been removed} |
02-20-2005 03:44 AM
#6
| |
Why wait to win a hand to get leverage on most of the table? If you hit on one of your garbage $8 raises you want as much money as possible to take down their stack. | |
| |
02-20-2005 03:47 AM
#7
| |
Guest
|
{This post has been removed} |
02-20-2005 03:52 AM
#8
| |
| |
| |
02-21-2005 04:41 AM
#9
| |
Guest
|
{This post has been removed} |
02-22-2005 12:03 AM
#10
| |
|
wellHey rippy, i was wondering if you always play as a smart maniac or do you look for group hands as well? Obviously the whole gus hanson thing is working for you and turning 70$ into 650 is great, and i shouldnt be commenting on this post since i havent watched you play for that long, but when do you cross the line between playing smart trying to get a maniac/fish attitude, and just being an expensive fish? Now please dont get me wrong, i am in no way calling you a fish, or even considering you to be close to one. I was just wondering if you where a hater of strong starting hands. What kinds of swings do you usually go through playing ring games? I know you are mainly tourneys, but im trying to get a better understanding of how you think when you sit at the table. How many times do you raise in position and hit nothing to fire out a huge bet on the flop and get called? |
02-22-2005 02:03 AM
#11
| |
In short: | |
| |
02-22-2005 02:05 AM
#12
| |
Guest
|
{This post has been removed} |
02-22-2005 02:11 AM
#13
| |
Hold'em in a nutshell: | |
| |
02-22-2005 03:21 AM
#14
| |
I find your buyin at that amount (and at your stakes) refreshing, Rippy. | |
| |
02-22-2005 08:24 AM
#15
| |
|
What are your thoughts on playing suited connectors in a raised pot (not by you). Me personally i will play them every time if the pot isnt raised more then 3x bb, and if there are a lot of callers i might play any way and hope for a kind flop, if not ill get out. |
02-22-2005 08:47 AM
#16
| |
|
this was for you rippy #1630264118: thedoctuh wins $136 from the main pot with a full house, Tens full of sevens. 107 sooted took out KK |
02-22-2005 08:51 AM
#17
| |
|
A couple hands later vs the same guy. |
02-22-2005 08:57 AM
#18
| |
|
One of the best things about this strat is 4 things usually happen. |
02-22-2005 08:59 AM
#19
| |
|
#1630280161: thedoctuh wins $131.1 from the main pot with a full house, Eights full of aces. |
02-22-2005 09:03 AM
#20
| |
|
#1630285663: thedoctuh wins $72 from the main pot with three of a kind, jacks. |
02-22-2005 09:20 AM
#21
| |
|
Eekkkk just got sucked out 3 consecutive times and lost all those winnings. Double edged sword no one believes you ever have anything and you will get sucked out on ALOT. |
02-22-2005 09:59 AM
#22
| |
man I wish I could play like a maniac. Only problem is in ring games if I lose a big pot thats the bankroll.... | |
| |