|
|
 Originally Posted by boost
I'm not following, but I'd like to.
Decisions could exist within a probability field, where an effect might never be determined 100% by its causes. There could be a range of effects with a range of probabilities that derive from the causes that come before.
If decisions are viewed as if they are chemistry or similar, they probably look determined. But I'm not sure decisions should be viewed like that. For all we know the causal chain of complex organisms contains randomness or something else.
If at a later date we perfectly model the universe and perfectly model causality, we might find ourselves saying things like this: "well in this situation the entity says yes 84% of the time and no 16% of the time".
|
Reply With Quote